Home » Forum > Build Blogs and Kit Reviews denotes Subscriber-only content | Tuesday 7 October 2008 | Personalise | Help  
JOIN TODAY!
Join ModelFlying now
Every month one new member will win a fantastic Silverlit Apache indoor R/C helicopter. Joining up is easy – and free! What are you waiting for?
why join?  
Members Logon
Email:
Password:
forgot your
password?
Top subscription offer!
Forum Hot Threads
72134 Total Messages
The October Grand Prize Draw
by David Ashby
Hello
by Jeff Glasser
Bedford Flyers
by Richard Purser
All things SAS wildthing
by David Martin 2
F16
by Michael Howell
» Loads More Threads
Latest Reviews
513 Total Reviews
Irvine Tutor 40
by michael smallbones
Spektrum DX6i
by Michael Dearden
Seagull Models Extra 300 EP
by Martin McIntosh
Irvine Tutor 40
by Leonard Hunt
Twister Medevac Bell
by John Holmes 4
RCV 58CD
by Michael Rowe
Irvine Tutor 40
by Mark Eames
Multiplex Mini-Mag
by Flash1
Graupner Ultra Duo Plus 50
by Peter Hawtin
Spektrum DX6i
by Rick Brayford
» Loads More Reviews
 FORUM
Discussions by:   Latest Posts | New Discussions | Hot Threads | Forum Topics
 Search forum: 
 in 
Review of the Li-Pro Imax 6 balancer/charger
Review of charger
81 to 100 of 128 messages. Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  To post a reply you need to be a member - Join now.

Forum Updates - Help Guide

 
Show/hide user stats

Its probably down to the total wattage limit of the cheaper B6 - cant recall now the exact figures, think its 50watt ? - therefore maximum current available at 22+ volts is ....around 2.2

50 / 22 = 2.2 

Edited: 28/01/08 10:50
Show/hide user stats

Makes sense, just wasnt sure! The AC supply is throwing 12V at a max of 5A so I thought this might be the root cause, but when we attatched the B6 to the same battery as the BC8 had been connected to it still onlly threw 2.1A out the other end.

Thanks Tim.

Ian 

Show/hide user stats

Hi, timbo, I was very interested to read your report but could you tell from your tests whether when starting a balancing charge with one or more low cells, that these are charged more to start with so that their voltage is raised up to the same as the rest in a short time so that as the remainder of the charge cycle progresses, all cells rise up at an equal voltage . This would enable you to have a balanced battery after just  a short partial charge (say 70-80%).I think I read of this happening in one of the other balancing chargers(I think the mgm-compro AQCB-4FC)  but I cant find the article and I dont thik it could  do the    A123 cells that I want to use.

Thanks Ken

Show/hide user stats

Hi Ken...there does seem to be some good activity on balancing individual cells when the pack is first connected, but having said so, it is a bit erratic, with other higher cells still receiving the odd short kick as it were !

This is remember, a fairly budget style balance /charger, and there have been some peeps who have decided to change some of the resistors for closer tolerance components -however they are all SMT and it is not something I have bothered to do - so I would not expect the m/processor to be quite as accurate as a top flight high end model....having said that, even on the "storage mode" which of course terminates the pack before fully charged, the cells end up pretty much in synch. HTH

Show/hide user stats

Timbo,

 I noticed in another review http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=746574 (sorry for the link to another forum!) that the manufacturer was looking at the problems of 1% resistors with a possible future change.  Do you know if anything came of this?

Great review btw.

Show/hide user stats

All I know is that some brave folk have decided to do their own mods, with better closer tolerance components.

Personally, I never bothered for 2 reasons

1) SMT is just too darn challenging my big fingers and fading closeup eyesight

2) never felt the need really....mine is close enough to accurate for comfort.

Can't say I know what the manufacturer has done, but somehow, at the price point these are being sold for, I doubt they will do anything.

As for those paranoid folk over the pond, well for me the final statement from the main complainent just about sums it all up really and  I quote...

"Overall, 0.03V overcharging does not seem to hurt the cells immediately. I guess it is still safe.

I will keep it for secondary charing -- meaning -- I use it only when my better chargers are charging other lipos.

For people who thinks the errors are acceptable, go ahead. It will work.

But, for me, I will not buy it again, I will invest 3 times the money for a charger with accurate reading."

Hmm, three times the money, just to solve a voltage readout which was out by 3/100ths of a volt.

As they would say....GO FIGURE!

Edited: 07/02/08 08:57
Show/hide user stats

Yeah, I'm of the same opinion, I think people like to rant and rave demanding greater accuracy just to try and look as if they are somehow better the rest of us!

Looking on Ebay these are going for £30 + £18 p&p from HK, looks like a good buy to me (unless anyone can do better?!!)

Show/hide user stats
sounds like an excellent buy - are you sure they are the same spec ?
Show/hide user stats
yep...thats the one. £49  posted aint bad I guess, - not sure how the UK sellers are on price these days ?
Show/hide user stats

Hi Timbo,

 Thanks for a very useful review.  I have just moved on to LiPo's from NiCad/NiMh and bought some 3S 1700mAh packs from BRC Hobbies.  My excellent Propeak Supernova is pre-LiPo's so I needed another charger.  BRC recommended the Lipro.plus 5 at £49.99 as it included balancer sockets that matched their cells.  It is identical with your model apart from the name logo.  The instructions were scanty but understandable, and I plugged it in and off it went.  It seemed to do the business, but I didn't do your comprehensive checks of performance, so it's great to have confirmation that it is likely to be working well, and is good value.

All the best.

Chris

Show/hide user stats

Ah...I am afraid it is NOT identical, it only does up to 5 Lipo cells ( the clue is in the name )

Furthermore I think you will find it lacks certain software programming such as storage mode and so on. I think I pointed out the shortfalls of this particular model to someone else here recently...I will try and find the post /link.

The rather better LiPro6 which I reviewed is actually available for even less than you paid for this inferior 5 cell version ...but I will not publish on the forum where to purchase ( its UK supplier too !! )

Email me for details. 

Edited: 17/02/08 17:22
Show/hide user stats

Ah, the comments I made to another member was actually on this very thread ....just a long time ago now, so I had forgotten

Check back to around page two or so...it was Doug Ireland - who has since bought the "real thing" EG a LiPro6.

Heres the extract of what I said to Doug earlier, and I think this is the same charger as you have just bought

I have found the manual for this version online, and I am not impressed.

( to make matters worse, you also paid more than I did for the "proper one " )

This earlier version is only 5 lipo cell maximum capable, and ONLY does LiPo not Ion or the the new LiFe types. Furthermore it is very linited as to other features which are on the IMAX. EG:

There is no discharge facility.

No cycling feature.

User cannot tweak peak detect voltage sensititvity.

NO storage mode for Lithium....and many more

I dont want this thread to turn into a legal debate, but seriously...... I dont know how they can describe it as - and I quote......

"Lipro-Plus 5, not just a charger but also a complete charging and maintenance centre for batteries!
We are proud to introduce our new compact, stylish and fully featured professional solution to charging and maintaining all types of batteries."

Personally I would return it as unfit for purpose based on that description.

To be a professional solution to charging and maintaining all types of batteries " requires that they can be cycled or at least discharged to an empty state in order to establish the complete charge put back in. Cycling of Nicads is particularly recommended, and even this feature is non existent.

I am afraid you have bought a bit of a lemon IMO.

In case you havent got this manual

 

Show/hide user stats
Hope it's not my favourite supplier (begins with Robot and ends with birds)
Show/hide user stats

Yeh - mine too, and what does "birds" end with....all over your car bonnet usually

Actually I think he got his from BRC hobbies...who are cool

Edited: 17/02/08 17:47
Show/hide user stats
Sorry Timbo, I meant I hope the UK supplier you referred to as having the Imax 6 at that price wasn't them, I'd have to pass on giving them my custom, 'nuff said.
Show/hide user stats
Nope - its not them ( I agree with you I am afraid )
Show/hide user stats

Don't suppose you could pm me the name could you Timbo?

 Ta

Show/hide user stats
An excellent piece of kit and well worth the money!

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  


Change stats view
Make external bookmarkAdd to My Bookmarks

« Previous thread   -   Next thread »
Home > Forum > Build Blogs and Kit Reviews Forum jump  
Support Our Partners

Send to friend | Join Now ^ Top of Page
About ModelFlying
- About Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions

Subscribe to MODELFLYING RSS news feed.
Contact Us
- Support
- Advertise with us
- FAQ
- Retailers: free site review
Magicalia Digital Publishing
Cycling
- BIKEmagic
- RoadCyclingUK
- SheCycles
- LondonCycleSport
- Visordown
- ProTourNews
Outdoors
- OUTDOORSmagic
- FISHINGmagic
- GOLFmagic
- TheMainSail
Lifestyle
- ThinkBaby
- Gardening.co.uk
- AVReview
- ThinkCamera
Hobbies
- ModelFlying
- MilitaryModelling
- ModelBoats
- GetWoodWorking

- Full Portfolio
© 1999-2008 Magicalia Ltd.