Hi Paul
Not drilled the holes for the screws yet, will let you know what I think.
Now I am coming to the end of the construction I would like to share my thoughts on the Warhawk so far.
Before I purchased the P-40 I did a web search to find out if the warhawk was a good model. The opinions ranged from horror stories of tailplane failure,firewalls ripping out and the U/C failing during landings, to others saying it is the best thing since sliced bread with no problems after many flights, built as it is with no modifiications.
The firewall as I understand was a problem now modified by H9
.
The U/C failures may be due to heavy landings, poor landing skills or rough ground flying sites.
The tailplane failure may be caused by flying the model too hard possibly a vertical dive from altitude at full throttle with a sharp pull up at the end or stresses placed during non scale aerobatics,it is after all considered to be a semi-scale sports model
.
One guy even thought H9 used hot glue for the consruction of the airframe,H9 pointed out it is the resin in the glue H9 uses which gives it the white hot glue looking colour
.
On balance the vast majority of people praised the P-40
.
I found the construction to be straight forward with very clear instructions with nice hints added at the end of some sections. I have built as per the instuctions with the exception of securing the wheel wells with screws rather than gluing to allow future access to the U/C bell cranks.
If anything falls off or fails to do its job, I shall report on this blog
.
This is the fourth ARTF I have constructed ,of the two I have flown ,one has needed modification (engine mount Ripmax Spit) so it may be the P-40 will need mods in some way.
.
Must send the info off for my exhaust
.
Cheers all
Kelvin