By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

Member postings for Daithi O Buitigh

Here is a list of all the postings Daithi O Buitigh has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.

Thread: What star sign are you? Is there a trend with flyers?
05/02/2018 04:38:55

Would being born under Ophiuchis make one officious?

Thread: Ebay sellers...
07/01/2018 22:15:22

Just for a change, this guy is selling the repros of the old Veron Tru-Flite kits for a quid less than Vintage (with free postage)

Mark you, I can recall being able to buy 4 Tru-Flite/KK Junior Scale kits, a large tube of Britfix, a can of dope, my copy of Aeromodeller and pay my bus fare home and still have change from a quid :D

Edited By Daithi O Buitigh on 07/01/2018 22:16:45

Thread: Warbird Replicas Bf 109 club.
22/12/2017 21:50:47

Hip Pocket has all profile publications in pdf - the Emil is Profile number 40 and the Gustav is 113

21/12/2017 10:13:08

All I got was a note saying I owed the coal merchant for one lump

19/12/2017 19:48:19

The Luftwaffe did have a captured Spit with a DB 605


Thread: usbasp not found
17/12/2017 07:37:02

You need the driver - check here for a 'how to'

Thread: Field Repairs
10/12/2017 01:07:57

duct tape

Thread: RAF's Finest Biplane? Hawker Fury MkI
07/12/2017 01:17:03

Like all fasteners they would be a standard size (so that the Erks didn't have to carry round an assortment of different size screwdrivers to open them)

In the case of the Spit, they would be 1/2 inch (the RAF hadn't gone metric back then)


Edited By Daithi O Buitigh on 07/12/2017 01:19:58

Thread: Warbird Replicas Bf 109 club.
30/11/2017 00:57:14

Even better Tom.In one of the early Next Gen episodes, Picard said "Computer: hard copy only"

Has anyone EVER seen a printer on the Enterprise?:D

Thread: Sign of the times - funnies
26/11/2017 19:41:03

Bet you didn't know RC did this laugh


Thread: Veron Fokker DVIII 46
12/11/2017 15:49:22

I've the Profile booklet in pdf here. It should be available for download in a couple of weeks from outerzone (it's number 67 and, at present, their latest is number 62 (it's not terribly accurate in the main drawing with a lozenge covered spreader bar - Platz actually intended that to be an auxiliary fuel tank so fabric covering would have definitely been a no-no).

As I said earlier, colour on the wing undersides is hard to tell - the film used at that time tended to darken blues to almost black

12/11/2017 15:07:57

It's very doubtful if they had a two tone scheme - it's more probable that they would have used the IdFlieg standard which was a streaky olive on the upper surfaces and blue under. It's hard to tell if it was blue under in the old photos but the photos you posted are from a replica and not an original (I don't believe there are any originals left anyway)

12/11/2017 14:04:31

The story is a lot deeper and more mysterious than that Tom. There was a distrust of monoplanes following a crash in 1912 of a Bristol-Coanda (which had nothing to do with it being a monoplane) and also the negative comments from RFC personnel on the Morane Saulnier Type 'N' (the landing speed was 'too high' among other issues). That had the result of the Bristol M1 being sent to the Middle East and not the European Front (on a side note - why is it always referred to as the 'Western Front' when it was actually in the EAST. The GERMANS called it the 'Western Front' )

But aside from that, there was a total discarding of German technological development after 1918 - the cantilever wing structures of the Fokker DVI, DVII and DVIII which removed the need for drag-inducing rigging wires was completely ignored, The all metal monocoque construction of the Junkers J series was also consigned to the abyss.

I'd be a shade sceptical of the flamboyant colour schemes - I've seen drawings showing them but nary a photograph of one, which makes me wonder just where they came from, bearing in mind that their actual squadron use was such a short period (which didn't give enough time for the erks to do any fancy paintwork before it was 'alles kaput' )

All totally irrelevant to Simon's posting really laugh


Edited By Daithi O Buitigh on 12/11/2017 14:05:56

11/11/2017 22:30:19

There is actually a difference between the EV and the DVIII due to the modified wing construction. From Profile Publications Number 67 "Production of the EV was resumed late in September 1918. The wing-spar flanges were, at the request of the Flugzeugmeisterei, increased in thickness by 2 mm as a safeguard against manufacturing errors. Aircraft with the new wing were to be re-designated Fok. DVIII. It was laid down that aircraft built as EVs were to be given the new designation; this does not seem to have been done in every case, however, as a few examples of the type survived the armistice bearing the EV designation."

As it didn't go into operational service until the 24th October 1918, the designation would have been 'DVIII' anjd not 'EV' in line with the Luftstreitkrafte designation (even though some did have the 'EV' marking).

Seems a bit strange though that an aircraft that was in operational service for less than three weeks should have such a reputation :D

One point though Tom. The 'D' for Doppeldekker had actually been phased out and all subsequent Fokker fighter aircraft used the 'D' designation, including the DXXI used by the Finnish Air Force

11/11/2017 12:47:40

Simon, the building instructions (from the original kit/plan) are over on outerzone.

Regarding dihedral - The D VIII had no 'dihedral' as such -- the upper surface was flat but the under surface was tapered up towards the tip which gave a dihedral effect.

Sheeting the wing is more accurate (scale wise) as the original did have a wooden wing (and also the airfoil spreader bar on the undercart). As neither of those were fabric covered, they did NOT have the lozenge camouflage which was only used on fabric

Thread: RAF's Finest Biplane? Hawker Fury MkI
11/11/2017 12:37:59

I think there's an exemption here Danny: From the relevant legislation:

s32.—Illustration for instruction Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of instruction does not infringe copyright as long as not for commercial purposes."

Edited By Daithi O Buitigh on 11/11/2017 12:38:39

Thread: Ideas for articles in RCM&E
09/11/2017 01:10:23

Pat, that's ALL the CE mark does and it only applies to commercial equipment. It's not necessary for home brew gear, however, that doesn't mean that you can flout the regulations (you have to be able to measure frequency deviation, spurii and a few other things or the RIS boys will land on you like a ton of bricks. All the CE mark does is to tell you that a sample piece has been tested to see if it complies with the EMC regs and that it's electrically safe.

Check here

Edited By Daithi O Buitigh on 09/11/2017 01:12:32

08/11/2017 19:43:17

Part of the problem is hat with the 'cheap and cheerful' electronic equipment of all sorts, it simply isn't feasible to actually build your own gear. I have a ham radio license and, while I could build my own transmitter, etc, I couldn't do it for the cost of an 'over the counter' Icom or Yaesu (not to mention the fact that physical size has shrunk to such an extent that it's almost impossible to manually assemble it). The same applies to radio control gear: while it is permissible to build your own (and the 'CE' certification doesn't enter into it) you can run into severe problems with the Radio Investigation Service boys if your gear spatters and interrupts someone's viewing of 'Neighbours'. I'm not sure on the legality of model control equipment, but licensed amateurs are permitted to build their own transmitters (and can pump 400 Watts into a multi-element beam) but they have to be able to check on Electro Magnetic Compatibility (in short - no interference). I would doubt that many builders/fliers would have the equipment to do that. I did, back in the 27 MHz, button pushing, single channel days, build my own transmitter and receiver (the transmitter was built into an Oxo tin laugh ) and I had it checked out by a friendly IBA engineer (after I bribed him with a collection of old 'Wireless World' magazines that I'd acquired - they ended up in the IBA library at the local ITV transmitter). They dated from the 1940s to 1950s and had the Arthur C. Clarke article foreelling satellite communication. But that's another story for another day.

Thread: Hobbyking returns
02/11/2017 14:48:30

To the best of my knowledge you can return faulty items to Elmslett, irrespective of where they were purchased. Unfortunately you still have to pay the P&P but it's a lot less than the cost of returning it to Hong Kong or the Netherlands

Thread: DOH!
02/11/2017 14:43:28

Tucking a pair of alligator clip leads on a LiPo charger multi-connect loom out of the way by clipping them to another lead. Result, one completely burnt out wiring loom when I went to charge up a 3S pack (and scorched fingers when I didn't let go of the loom fast enough)

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!

Find RCM&E! 

Email News - Join our newsletter

Love Model Aircraft? Sign up to our emails for the latest news and special offers!

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
electricwingman 2017
Airtek Hobbies
Gliders Distribution
Expo Tools 14 July
Wings & Wheels 2018
Advertise With Us
Latest "For Sale" Ads
How has your building graduated?
Q: Did you start with ARTF and move to building from kits or vice versa?

 Started with ARTF moved to building from kits only
 Started with ARTF moved to building from plans only
 Started with ARTF moved to building from kits and building from plans
 Started with building kits or from plans and moved to ARTF
 I only build from kits or plans
 I only build ARTF
 I only build from kits
 I only build from plans
 Other (Please specify in thread)

Latest Reviews
Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues

Contact us

Contact us