Modifying a scale plan
|kevin b||10/01/2017 20:20:56|
1456 forum posts
I wonder if anyone can offer advice please.
I have been looking for a nice scale biplane to put my OS 40FS in. Something a bit "different", but vintage.
I have found a nice plan ate 41ins span (1/9th scale), but it is for a 45-60 four stroke.
I wondered if I reduced the scale down to 37.5ins (1/10th scale) and build light, would that be about right for my engine ? Scaling down plans is not a problem to me.
I did consider trying to build the original very light, but of course there is the drag factor as well.
It's curious that when I look at the old free flight plans the engines are all under half the size of the modern RC equivalents, but I suppose they weren't intended to perform aerobatics (intentionally) !
|Denis Watkins||10/01/2017 20:32:51|
|2042 forum posts|
You are on the right track Kevin, I fly 3, .40 4 strokes and they all comfortably fly 4.5 lbs, and I estimate 0.6hp to be about 450 watts. All 3 models are high wingers, but one is 50inch span. A biplane as you know doubles on wing drag, but you are in the ballpark and should consider weight also. I ran one motor in on a Boomerang, it was not sprightly, but it served as a platform, and that is 62inch at 5lb, or more. I would build the 41inch light as you say, as below that wingspan, flying can become a little twichy.
Edited By Denis Watkins on 10/01/2017 20:35:07
|5221 forum posts|
I would expect an OS 40FS to be fine for a 41inch span biplane or up to about 48 inch span, depending on the performance required. Only a bipe like the Pitts or Ultimate that need excessive power for vertical performance would need larger.
Early 4 strokes were not as powerful as later models so that might account for the 45 to 60 being specified, however it might also be because the model had a very short nose and used the weight of the larger engine for that reason.
|Martin Harris||11/01/2017 19:57:16|
7117 forum posts
My Puppeteer (60" biplane weighing 8 lbs according to Flair) flew perfectly well on an OS 40 FS with no meaningful compression - so your one should be a doddle (even unscaled) unless you're looking at Pitts performance!
|kevin b||11/01/2017 20:20:45|
1456 forum posts
Thanks for the information guys.
I think I will go with the plan as is. If I build light and it is ok, fine. If not I could always put a bigger engine in it. I have a spare Irvine 60 2 stroke !!!
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!
Love Model Aircraft? Sign up to our emails for the latest news and special offers!