By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by CML Distribution

Funterceptor build

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Big Phil24/07/2009 09:49:22
avatar
1074 forum posts
90 photos
I've just started building the Funterceptor and already thinking that if it comes in too heavy am I right in thinking that if I increase the wing span slightly this will keep the wing loading nearer the quoted figures?
I built the Wattsdog back  a while ago and this was over-weight(bit like me really) this did not make much differance because it was with this model that I thought I could  teach my self to fly.!! It did not last past the second or third  flight.
 Any advice is greatly accepted.


 
Tim Mackey24/07/2009 09:56:19
20268 forum posts
251 photos
16 articles
Theoretically yes Phil. Of course a larger wing menas more weight proportionally, so you could end up on the spiral IYKWIM
Big Phil24/07/2009 11:25:21
avatar
1074 forum posts
90 photos
Din't think of it like that. I don't mean to sound thick, but what does IYKWIM mean?
Tim Mackey24/07/2009 12:28:04
20268 forum posts
251 photos
16 articles
If You Know What I Mean
Chris Reid09/08/2009 07:22:56
avatar
68 forum posts
8 photos
Hi Big Phil,
 
Funterceptor is very light, and if you stick with the wood sizes/grades, it will be hard to make it too heavy if you have power.  It will just  stall at a slightly higher speed.  The orginal flew with NiMH cells so if you use LiPo's you may save a bit of weight there.  By all means add a bit to the span (an extra rib bay at each side should do it).  The original 36" wing was to let me use stock balsa strip.
 
All the best,
 
Chris
Mike Robey11/08/2009 10:32:01
avatar
54 forum posts
15 photos
Hi Phil,
 
Chris is right.  One thing to watch though is the covering that you use.
My Funterceptor was my first scratch build and I asked the hobby shop
guys which heat shrink is the easiest to use.  Turns out the one they
recommended was also the heaviest.  Being a newbie to building it never
occurred to me that there was a weight difference.
 
The other point is Chris's comments about grades of wood.  I didn't know
any better and used balsa from a hardware store.
 
The result was my plane weighed in 50% overweight!  However
it still flies nicely.  You do notice it on landing because it lands faster
than it should and there is no floating. Stall and handling are still user friendly
though (no nasty wing dropping).
 
All in all I have got a lot of joy out my little Funterceptor and hope you do as well.
 
Enjoy the building and the flying.
Chris Reid06/06/2011 08:28:54
avatar
68 forum posts
8 photos
I don't suppose many Funterceptor bulders read this now. However, having established that the motor and ESC could cope, I recently converted mine to 1300mAh 3S Lipo power.
 
The model is transformed. Always a good performer, near vertical climbs are possible and squarish cornered aeros. It's a bit lighter too. Well worth the switch.
 
Look out for my Agritug when RCM&E get round to it. It's a bigger Funterceptor and does everything better.
 
Chris Reid

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Login/Create Account
Email address
Password
 Forgotten Login?

Not got an account?

Why join?

New Poll - how many build projects do you have running?
Q: How many build projects (ARTF and trad)do you have running?

 None
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
 10+

Modelflying Offers


Competitions

 

 

Latest Reviews
Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Support Our Partners
Advertise With Us
TJD Models
Gustav Staufenbiel
PuffinModels
Gliders Distribution
Airogrip
Braincube Aeromodels
Airtekhobbies
cml
MyHobbyStore.co.uk

Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues