By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by CML Distribution

Range checking with a 2.4 Tx module conversion

Optic 6 conversion to 2.4 GHz with Corona module-removing aerial for range check

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Myron Beaumont21/06/2011 19:03:00
avatar
5740 forum posts
51 photos
Browsing through this conversion on U tube clips .someone showed removing the actual aerial ( it simply screws onto the replacement module )to do a range check at the usual 30 metres or so . Sounds a bit dodgy to me but what do you clever guys out there think ?
Myron
Bob Cotsford21/06/2011 19:34:52
avatar
2868 forum posts
114 photos
I've run Corona and other brand 2.4GHz modules without the aerial, usually when setting up servos in a new model or to drive a flight sim. The module have always remained cool to the touch and I've never had one fail si I don't think it's a huge risk to the module.
 
However -
I'm really surprised he could get 30 paces without the aerial, and even then it's not a proper reduced power test as it will not show up a fault in the aerial itself - not an unknown problem as the coax can fracture where it passes through the bendy bit. I'm sure he would look suitably surprised to find he had the same range with or without the aerial.

Edited By Bob Cotsford on 21/06/2011 19:35:45

Myron Beaumont22/06/2011 09:23:29
avatar
5740 forum posts
51 photos
Bob
Thanks for the info .So it wouldn't overheat . Yep, I was a little surprised about the 30 paces bit .I think I'll stick to getting 'er indoors to go for a walk If the distance is disputable ,then there's not much point in doing it is there?
Myron
Toni Reynaud22/06/2011 21:47:55
avatar
159 forum posts
I seem to recall that Corona suggest a range check by putting both Rx Antennas together (if you are runnng a twin antenna Rx), the pointing the ends of the Tx and Rx antennas at each other and putting distance between Tx and Rx. This is logical to me, asthe least signal is tranmitted and received at the ends of the antennas, so this is a deliberate worst case situation.
Given that the 2.4 GHz power output is minimal, I logically don't see a problem with taking the Tx antenna off - it's akin to testing 35 MHz with a short antenna and probably wouldn't harm the RF output stages of the Tx, but intuitively I wouldn't like to do it for too long.
Myron Beaumont24/06/2011 19:32:40
avatar
5740 forum posts
51 photos
Thanks Toni
I'll try it .

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Login/Create Account
Email address
Password
 Forgotten Login?

Not got an account?

Why join?

New Poll - Crash Causes
Q: In your experience, what's the most common cause of a crash?

 Pilot error (flying skills)
 Adverse weather conditions
 Structural failure
 Engine failure
 C of G issues
 Battery failure/s
 Incorrect model assembly/wiring
 Other causes (please say in poll forum thread)

Modelflying Offers


Competitions

 

 

Latest Posts
Latest Reviews
Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Support Our Partners
Gustav Staufenbiel
TJD Models
PuffinModels
Advertise With Us
cml
Braincube Aeromodels
Airtekhobbies
Gliders Distribution
MyHobbyStore.co.uk