By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by CML Distribution

OverKill.... Do I need to add so much strength n weight..??

Ply 'space frame' inner...

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Cyclicscooby05/07/2012 14:02:36
avatar
798 forum posts
442 photos

Hi Guys...

So, 2m W/S 'Cartoon' Cub.. (It's scale in my mind, but for arguments sake, lets says cartoon scale)

Using 6mm depron, the panels are all flat, no fancy profiling like Glenn does, so no bends, just (weak) square joints...

Thing is, whilst i'm aware that many RTF foamies are JUST foam, maybe with a CF spar, I don't 'feel' the foam is enuf, in sheet form.. ( atleast in the 'square box' form this is in)

To this end, i'm adding a ply 'space-frame' to connect the wings, wheels, and motor... Is this overkill.. ?? Too much weight..?? Clearly I could use depron formers instead, but I want something that'll last....

This is what i'm on about.. A bare side panel..

07 sides cut out

.

And with the ply inner...

08 inner ply support 1

Ignore the bolts, they're just holding the two ply sides together. It's 1.5mm ply, so while it's weight is minimal, it's heavy compared to just foam..

There will be front n rear ply formers, and a ply floor panel to join all wing n wheel stress points. Plus an inner motor box. The rear will be 'wood-free'

Similar to my little CH, here

11 Fuse F1-F4 in

but without the front formers, ( it's a steerable trike, and needed them )

I figure, the stresses on the wing roots, and 'thump' on the gear, will be transfered thru this, instead of the foam, helping with longevity... ?!

The motor, Lipo n Esc weigh in @ 700g by the way...

.

Any thoughts, comments, previous experience, idea's, voices in your head, etc....

I just wanna know if i'm OK going this route, or whether I should just stop now and go do the washing up instead..?

 

Luv

Chrisie.. xx

 

Edited By Steve Hargreaves - Moderator on 05/07/2012 14:30:49

JC05/07/2012 14:44:07
avatar
276 forum posts
53 photos

Hi

I don't build these sort of models myself but a couple of the guys at the club build little else. They always seem to use ply formers in their bigger depron self built models.

JC

Cyclicscooby05/07/2012 14:54:07
avatar
798 forum posts
442 photos

Cheers JC.. I'm not on my own then.. Phew..

I should add, what you see, is all the wood.. It's just in the cockpit. not a full skeleton..

Luv

Chrisie.. xx

Biggles' Elder Brother - Moderator05/07/2012 15:33:07
avatar
Moderator
8840 forum posts
431 photos

Looks a sensible measure to me. With a drive train of 700g that's potentailly a lot of momentum in a less than perfect landing. Like you I doubt that Depron alone would happily support that sort of impact many times.

BEB

Simon Chaddock05/07/2012 20:36:34
avatar
2905 forum posts
1349 photos

Well it is rather going to depend on your glazing, how rigid it is and how well it can be fixed to the Depron.

Lets say you had no glazing at all would you feel the resulting Depron 'box' would be strong enough?

I would guess it probably would be but your solution looks eminently sensible.

The final issue is where do you want it to break? A really strong stiff centre might result in more serious damage elsewhere that a weaker but more flexible structure might survive. After all Depron is, within limits, a 'flexible' foam.

Actually designing things to break in a crash is probably a bit 'over the top' but then we don't have crashes, do we!wink 2

Plummet05/07/2012 21:13:39
avatar
630 forum posts
25 photos

One point to consider. A flat sheet is weak and floppy. Curve it, or roll it in a tube and it gains a lot of rigidity.

The sides of your cub are flat, so need strengthening. If they had been curved, then they may have needed less.

Think corrugated cardboard!

Plummet

riverlandgirl.06/07/2012 07:50:31
avatar
289 forum posts
154 photos

For what it's worth, I would extend the wing root area aft down the top edge of the side some what. You have a very narrow strip of depron above the small curved window, that would love to compress and buckle, (assuming no, or non ridged windows of course)

Peter Miller06/07/2012 08:21:10
avatar
4136 forum posts
435 photos
1 articles

I don't use depron but looking at what you have done, it looks really sensible. Those narrow areas are also in a highly stressed area and so the ply reinforcement is essential.

I have played with some depron just to see what it is like and there is no real strength in it unless it is in quite laerge sizes or forming a double walled box.

Very neat work too.

Martin Harris06/07/2012 09:28:25
avatar
3797 forum posts
104 photos

Just an observation but the grain of the ply is in its weakest orientation across the high stress areas of the upright pillars. I'm guessing there will be a former at 90 degrees to these jouning the sides so hopefully this will give sufficient strength?

A major part of the "traditional" strength of a Cub's front wing mounting is is the triangular structure through the front screen area as per full size - usually piano wire in models but maybe some CF would be appropriate here?

Edited By Martin Harris on 06/07/2012 09:36:45

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Login/Create Account
Email address
Password
 Forgotten Login?

Not got an account?

Why join?

New Poll - Crash Causes
Q: In your experience, what's the most common cause of a crash?

 Pilot error (flying skills)
 Adverse weather conditions
 Structural failure
 Engine failure
 C of G issues
 Battery failure/s
 Incorrect model assembly/wiring
 Other causes (please say in poll forum thread)

Modelflying Offers


Competitions

 

 

Latest Posts
Latest Reviews
Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Support Our Partners
Gustav Staufenbiel
TJD Models
cml
Airtekhobbies
Braincube Aeromodels
Gliders Distribution
PuffinModels
Advertise With Us
MyHobbyStore.co.uk