By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

XR61

Manufacturer: Precision Aerobatics

Find more products by Precision Aerobatics

Average Rating
No. of Reviews1
RRPN/A

John Roberts 9 wrote on 26/07/2017:
A CURATE'S EGG - GOOD IN PARTS!
Strengths: The design is a minor work of art and the finished model looks beautiful and flies nicely too. The German distributor, Braeckman.de, are worthy of much praise too. Using them should hold no fears for UK purchasers.
Weaknesses: The list of weaknesses is depressingly long. Don't get me wrong, the XR61 is a beautiful design and the blend of balsa & carbon fibre is both inspired and highly aesthetically pleasing but the whole thing is badly let down by poor manufacturing quality control. Every aspect of the build required me to modify or fettle to get things to fit properly. I won't list all the issues but two of the most annoying concerned the cowl and the horizontal stabilizer. The (beautifully made & finished) cowl was a nightmare. Fitted in the correct position vis--vis the prop adapter & spinner meant that the canopy wouldn't fit. Moving the cowl forward enough to enable the canopy to fit meant that an insufficient length of motor shaft was exposed to safely attach the prop assembly. As for the horizontal stabilizer this was more that 15 degrees out of whack relative to the wings. The list goes on but I am sure you get the picture.
Overall: It took me 35+ hours to assemble this 'ARTF'. The end result is a very satisfying aircraft but I suspect that for those without building skills the XR61 would have been a considerable challenge. It now flies very well and looks great in the air. Its light weight (around 4 pounds compared to 6+ pounds for most other '50 size' models) remarkably allows flights of 6 - 7 minutes on 2200mAh batteries. I am a fan of PA products (this is the third PA in my hangar) but I would need to think carefully about buying another. Any prospective purchasers need to go into this one with their eyes wide open. To PA I would say, get your QC act together guys. I have rated the VFM as 'Good'. Poor would be too harsh but in the absence of an 'OK' or 'Moderate' button I felt I had no other option.
Ease of assembly
40%
Build quality
40%
Flight performance
80%
Value for money
60%
Overall
40%

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!

Find RCM&E! 

Email News - Join our newsletter

Love Model Aircraft? Sign up to our emails for the latest news and special offers!

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
Airtek Hobbies
electricwingman 2017
Gliders Distribution
Wings & Wheels 2018
CML
Expo Tools 14 July
Overlander
Slec
Advertise With Us
Sarik
Latest "For Sale" Ads
How has your building graduated?
Q: Did you start with ARTF and move to building from kits or vice versa?

 Started with ARTF moved to building from kits only
 Started with ARTF moved to building from plans only
 Started with ARTF moved to building from kits and building from plans
 Started with building kits or from plans and moved to ARTF
 I only build from kits or plans
 I only build ARTF
 I only build from kits
 I only build from plans
 Other (Please specify in thread)

Latest Reviews
Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues

Contact us

Contact us