Jump to content

Sleeker single-channel model from 1968


thunderstreak.keith
 Share

Recommended Posts

Posted by Phil Green on 07/04/2016 22:33:01:

Thats brilliant David, its great to give these old single-channel designs a fresh airing.
And, you now have some photos for the Sleeker re-issue!

Yes, back in the day when we flew C/L I often drooled over the S/C designs in the APS plans Handbook, which then seemed like the height of unattainable sophistication to me

Thing is, I've never seen a built example of the vast majority of those so this - along with the general S/C revivial that has been gaining ground recently - is of real interest

Good pics, very nice looking model thumbs up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi guys. Well I've started building my own sleeker from the free plans (first ever build from just plans). So far both wings are built and with sincere apologies to yourself and your father David I have modified the wings slightly. They are longer by one rib each side, I have added a wing spar for a little more strength, added ailerons and slightly reduced the dihedral. So far it is looking great, just waiting to purchase and install servos on the wings and then I'll apply the top skin balsa and finish shaping. In the mean time I have been carefully studying the plan for the fuselage and I have a couple of beginner questions;

The fuselage side walls are double skinned - should each skin have the wood grain direction at 90 degrees to each other?

Do you attach the formers to the first (internal) skin, bend to correct shape and then attach the outer skin?

Forgive my naivety, as I said earlier it's my first build. I promise as soon as can I will get some photos up of my progress.

TP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

About time I did an update I guess. Nearly 3 months has passed since my last post and my sleeker is still not finished. But its getting close.

Its been a slow build but when you work away like I do time is very limited so any build I undertake will be slow. Plus being my first plan build I've been trying to be as accurate as I can and planned each stage carefully.

I've really enjoyed building this little beauty so far and I'm certain it won't b my last build.

Background:

I modified the wing to include ailerons, reduced the dihedral and extended the wing length by one rib distance each side. Total wing length is now 950mm.

Fuselage was built to include the undercarriage as per the original drawings however, the plan is to make the nose wheel steerable and instead of having the wheels attached by elastic band, I designed them to slide in to the fuselage and they can be removed the same way.

Current weight stands at 400grams without a motor, ESC, Rx, battery or associated wiring so, so far so good.

Photos next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, it's finished. Now just waiting for its maiden. thoroughly enjoyed the build. Will let you know how the maiden goes in a couple of weeks.

Hacker A30-28s 1140kv motor, 30 amp esc, 2200mAh 3s battery, CoG came out pretty much exactly as per the magazine, AUW 770gm. Should go OK I think. laugh

imgp1881.jpg

imgp1882.jpgimgp1880.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sleeker update.

Quick note on my Sleeker maiden yesterday. 😁😁 I'll be smiling for weeks. A little bit of trim adjustment to get the dive glide right and it is a thoroughly lovely plane to fly. She is definitely a V12 powered rocket ship and a bit of a hooligan machine (understatement) but so much fun and easy to handle. No nasty surprises at all.

The addition of ailerons has I think made rolls really snappy, the additional length on the wing makes it glide a little better I think and leaving a bit of dihedral in makes it gently return to flat attitude making landing very relaxed. Experimented a little with inverted flight which was fine with a reasonable dose of down elevator to hold it. I think there may be opportunity to drop the prop size a touch from 10 x 5 to maybe 9 x5 to tame her down a bit (not sure about this as it's a lot of fun as is) and the 2200 battery gives me at least 15 mins flight time with power to spare so a lighter battery may be beneficial for some weight saving. Not really necessary as it's perfectly lovely as is, but a little tinkering never hurts if it's easily reversed.

Couldn't be happier with the outcome given it was my first plan build and it flew so nicely first up. I think there will be many, many flights to come.

Thank you David for a lovely machine. Ton's Red Eagle next. 😁

TP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I've nearly finished a build of the Sleeker based on the latest version. i.e. no U/C, tailplane on top and electric power. However according to David's article downthrust and sidethrust are quite critical. I'd appreciate any advice on how best to set these. Is it just a matter of adding washers until it flys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had the maiden flight of the Sleeker today and suffice to say it landed in one piece.smiley
It has a very impressive climb rate to say the least! More downthrust required I think. For it size its very stable humming around on quarter throttle. Looks like it will be a very enjoyable model. Thanks to all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...