Jump to content

A question of coverings... help please?


Recommended Posts

Very late, I know, but I've just arrived at the stage where I can think about covering my Ballerina. But, I have a bit of a conundrum that I would like some advice on please? I'm set on covering the model in Stearmanesque colour scheme. Blue fuselage with yellow wings and fin without the red and white tail stripes. Other club members are singing the praises of Solartex saying how easy it is to use and how so much better it is than Solarfilm. I'm looking at the Vintage Blue and Vintage Yellow Solartex but note that it is heavier than Solarfilm. The Solarfilm website recommends it for use on medium size models upwards and this raises the question of will it be too heavy for the Ballerina?

Question is simple then Solarfilm or Solartex?

Thanks in advance for any help given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard, Just to encourage you a bit, IMO your question isn't of any great importance!

Think about it... Although it seems logical to think "Solartex for bigger models and film for small", the simple fact that only big models use a lot of covering material, while smaller models use much less covering, means that the weight difference is only significant on bigger models.

On a small model, the weight difference between tex and film is very small indeed.

I have a friend who has a 36" Vic Smeed Tomboy, covered in Solartex... It looks superb and flies perfectly. It was seeing that small model that made me realise that, with the small areas covered, any extra weight due to Solartex is negligible...

So to reassure yourself, calculate the weight difference between tex and film, for the area that you're going to use, and then ask yourself whether that weight difference (certainly less than 1 oz on a smallish model) could possibly make the plane overweight...

Edited By brokenenglish on 23/12/2016 09:58:49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer your question from another angle. Build a top half of a wingtip, and a few inches of wing inboard. Any scrap will do, and if it takes more than an hour, including design, sourcing scrap and build, you are being fussy.

Then practice till you get it right, with whatever you choose to use. Well worth the effort. You have invested a lot of time in that airframe. You care about the result. Don't use it as a test bed for learning to cover.

Remember, no one knows what horrors you bury under covering and paint. Cover neatly and you are the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Donald Fry on 23/12/2016 10:47:34:

 

Remember, no one knows what horrors you bury under covering and paint. Cover neatly and you are the man.

Or as we used to say back in the days of dope and tissue.

A good covering job will hide a bad building job but nothing hides a bad covering job

I also remember what Klaus Maikus who used to build super control line stiunters.

Everyone looks at the nose and cockpit  and that area. No one looks at the wing tips and tail unit. so they won't notice any rough bits in those areas

Edited By Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 10:58:51

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 10:52:49:
Posted by Donald Fry on 23/12/2016 10:47:34:

Remember, no one knows what horrors you bury under covering and paint. Cover neatly and you are the man.

Or as we used to say back in the days of dope and tissue.

A good covering job will hide a bad building job but nothing hides a bad covering job

Everyone looks at the nose and cockpit and that area. No one looks at the wing tips and tail unit. so they won't notice any rough bits in those areas

Edited By Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 10:58:51

Too true, and not many people tip the model upside down either!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice guys; it's really appreciated.

I looked at the Hobby King film and whilst I agree it is cheaper to buy, the only place I can get a yellow colour is to pay nearly £12 p&p to get it from Holland. Plus I don't need 10m of covering to leave at least 8m sat in the shed.

As many have said the additional weight of the Solartex won't be that significant and there will be an inverted OS52 Surpass up front to haul it along. So I'm going to order the vintage yellow and blue as previously stated.

Anyway, today saw the first time I put all the structural bits together, so I took a picture or two. Hopefully these will come out below:

img_2096.jpg

img_2098.jpgimg_2099.jpgimg_2104.jpgimg_2100.jpg

img_2095.jpgimg_2102.jpgimg_2097.jpgEdited By Richard Walton on 23/12/2016 17:59:28

Edited By Richard Walton on 23/12/2016 18:05:16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 18:00:21:

That looks briliant.

Thanks Peter! Coming from you, sir, that is indeed a compliment. smiley

It's pretty much as you designed it with the exception of:

  1. I went for micro-servos in the wings so that I could have differential aileron throws, and
  2. I made the underside of the fuselage in front of the wing removable so that I could get direct access to the SLEC fuel tank.
  3. Steerable tail wheel - we have a grass runway.

 

Edited By Richard Walton on 23/12/2016 18:11:39

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...