Richard Walton Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Very late, I know, but I've just arrived at the stage where I can think about covering my Ballerina. But, I have a bit of a conundrum that I would like some advice on please? I'm set on covering the model in Stearmanesque colour scheme. Blue fuselage with yellow wings and fin without the red and white tail stripes. Other club members are singing the praises of Solartex saying how easy it is to use and how so much better it is than Solarfilm. I'm looking at the Vintage Blue and Vintage Yellow Solartex but note that it is heavier than Solarfilm. The Solarfilm website recommends it for use on medium size models upwards and this raises the question of will it be too heavy for the Ballerina? Question is simple then Solarfilm or Solartex? Thanks in advance for any help given. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john stones 1 - Moderator Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Hobby king Film strong,light easy to use, good price, far better than solar film. John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Second that, and some nifty colours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 And to a certain extent, putting on covering is a knack. Solarfilm do good instructions, but sometimes you mess up, and pull it off and cut a new piece. Much less frustrating if it's a bit cheaper, and you have more to waste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former Member Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 [This posting has been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Davis Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 I only use Solartex on models with a wing area bigger than 600 sq.ins, but having said that, if you're new to covering, Solartex is very easy to use compared with film. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Laughton Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 I use Oracover as a preference to Soalrfilm or Solartex...easy to apply and goes round curves beautifully....it can be pricey though If you do use Solartex the company that makes it made some useful 'how to' videos which would be worth searching for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Miller Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Send 4 first class stamps to Solarfilm and you will get a free DVD on covering. Personally I use Solarfilm Supershrink Polyeaster. It is more tolerant to over enthusiastic application of hear. Shrinks perfectly and is less "plasticky|" than the others Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brokenenglish Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Richard, Just to encourage you a bit, IMO your question isn't of any great importance! Think about it... Although it seems logical to think "Solartex for bigger models and film for small", the simple fact that only big models use a lot of covering material, while smaller models use much less covering, means that the weight difference is only significant on bigger models. On a small model, the weight difference between tex and film is very small indeed. I have a friend who has a 36" Vic Smeed Tomboy, covered in Solartex... It looks superb and flies perfectly. It was seeing that small model that made me realise that, with the small areas covered, any extra weight due to Solartex is negligible... So to reassure yourself, calculate the weight difference between tex and film, for the area that you're going to use, and then ask yourself whether that weight difference (certainly less than 1 oz on a smallish model) could possibly make the plane overweight... Edited By brokenenglish on 23/12/2016 09:58:49 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 To answer your question from another angle. Build a top half of a wingtip, and a few inches of wing inboard. Any scrap will do, and if it takes more than an hour, including design, sourcing scrap and build, you are being fussy. Then practice till you get it right, with whatever you choose to use. Well worth the effort. You have invested a lot of time in that airframe. You care about the result. Don't use it as a test bed for learning to cover. Remember, no one knows what horrors you bury under covering and paint. Cover neatly and you are the man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Miller Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Posted by Donald Fry on 23/12/2016 10:47:34: Remember, no one knows what horrors you bury under covering and paint. Cover neatly and you are the man. Or as we used to say back in the days of dope and tissue. A good covering job will hide a bad building job but nothing hides a bad covering job I also remember what Klaus Maikus who used to build super control line stiunters. Everyone looks at the nose and cockpit and that area. No one looks at the wing tips and tail unit. so they won't notice any rough bits in those areas Edited By Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 10:58:51 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cymaz Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Posted by Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 10:52:49: Posted by Donald Fry on 23/12/2016 10:47:34: Remember, no one knows what horrors you bury under covering and paint. Cover neatly and you are the man. Or as we used to say back in the days of dope and tissue. A good covering job will hide a bad building job but nothing hides a bad covering job Everyone looks at the nose and cockpit and that area. No one looks at the wing tips and tail unit. so they won't notice any rough bits in those areas Edited By Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 10:58:51 Too true, and not many people tip the model upside down either! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Oh the cynicism, I am shocked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cymaz Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 It's true !! You look at a model, look at the cockpit, see what the engine is...........and then stroke the wing ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Walton Posted December 23, 2016 Author Share Posted December 23, 2016 Thanks for all the advice guys; it's really appreciated. I looked at the Hobby King film and whilst I agree it is cheaper to buy, the only place I can get a yellow colour is to pay nearly £12 p&p to get it from Holland. Plus I don't need 10m of covering to leave at least 8m sat in the shed. As many have said the additional weight of the Solartex won't be that significant and there will be an inverted OS52 Surpass up front to haul it along. So I'm going to order the vintage yellow and blue as previously stated. Anyway, today saw the first time I put all the structural bits together, so I took a picture or two. Hopefully these will come out below: Edited By Richard Walton on 23/12/2016 17:59:28 Edited By Richard Walton on 23/12/2016 18:05:16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Miller Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 That looks briliant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Walton Posted December 23, 2016 Author Share Posted December 23, 2016 Posted by Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 18:00:21: That looks briliant. Thanks Peter! Coming from you, sir, that is indeed a compliment. It's pretty much as you designed it with the exception of: I went for micro-servos in the wings so that I could have differential aileron throws, and I made the underside of the fuselage in front of the wing removable so that I could get direct access to the SLEC fuel tank. Steerable tail wheel - we have a grass runway. Edited By Richard Walton on 23/12/2016 18:11:39 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Davis Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Posted by Peter Miller on 23/12/2016 18:00:21: That looks briliant. Doesn't it just! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.