Jump to content

1/12 Messerschmitt Bf 109


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks
Looks are also fine for me. I'm always thinking about building one in double size. Would be an easy built, light and with 1/6 one of my favourite sizes. Someone did that years ago and it worked fine. But too many other projects are waiting...

 

On 25th May 1944 there was a low level crash of a P-51 B Mustang and a Bf 109 G over my hometown Botenheim. I learned about the story only a few years ago. American pilot Joe Bennett managed a bailout and German pilot Hubert Heckmann crash landed a few kilometers further. They met shortly afterwards. Through much luck next meeting was 1991, 47 years later. They became friends. I found an article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette about this story and what can be learned for today:

https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/Op-Ed/2020/05/25/Dogfight-German-village-Botenheim-clash-eagles-Next-Page-Bill-Zlatos/stories/202005250021

Just recently I learned some facts about the background. Luftwaffe got under big pressure in 1944. Allied fighters, especially long range Mustangs flew missions with the clear goal to combat German fighter planes. Often the Allied bombers were the bait. Luftwaffe planes were produced in high numbers but good pilots got less and less. Training young pilots was shortened and they flew missions with only little hours on front line fighter aircraft. I don't know much details about the flying experience of Hubert Heckmann. But the American flight of Mustangs chased German fighters in South-West Germany and for Heckmann it was only his second combat mission, very nearly his last.

Timo

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 04/10/2020 21:47:38

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one who built the bigger 109 used a foam cut wing, covered with balsa. I only saw a few pictures, but it seems he didn't change too much concerning the fuselage. Since he is making and selling retracts, the landing gear was no problem

There are pictures of this 109 in Africa colours, interestingly he is using carbon fibre tubes for the landing gear.

www.einziehfahrwerk.de/index.php/beispiele/alle-beispiele

Timo

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 05/10/2020 19:49:33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Concerning PSS: The last years I was busy applying unusual versions to my basic 109 plan. I occasionally did some work on the P1091 with the intention to use as many standard parts as possible. But it seems it gets a new plane, especially when it comes to the airfoil. SD6060 mod.12-10% will fly fine with motor and I think on the slope, but a thinner airfoil with a bit camber would be better perhaps for real thermalling.

In difference to the original draft, the model will have an enlarged tail, still looking small.

I'm still busy with the new home and workshop and then there's the Whirlwind waiting to be finished. But maybe the 1091 is something interesting for you, Martin? What kind of airfoil would you use?

http://www.luft46.com/roart/ro1091.html

Timo

p1091_stand 2020-12-05_klein.jpg

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 05/12/2020 22:10:56

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 05/12/2020 22:11:16

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 05/12/2020 22:11:49

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 05/12/2020 22:11:59

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck for the Allies and todays modellers that the German engineers wasted precious time for fantasy planes. Beneath x-planes of other nations it's a big source of unusual ideas. My brother built some like the Bv 141, Junkers EF 128 and EF 112. He's the specialist for really exotic planes but I couldn't persuade him yet to publish plans.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVOGwJ6Camw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUkec1rrWf0

https://wp.1dfh.de/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/modellflugtage-esslingen-20-09-2015/1dfh-200915-076.jpg

https://wp.1dfh.de/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/modellflugtage-esslingen-20-09-2015/1dfh-200915-075.jpg

Timo

Edited By Timo Starkloff on 06/12/2020 11:49:53

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Timo,

Surprisingly, a thin wing section is not a requirement for a PSS model. The past two mass builds (Hawker hurricane and NA Sabre) have use Eppler 374 and they soar rather well.

Admittedly we usually fly in good lift, the Sabre has flown (just) in 12mph winds on the Great Orme up to 45mph+ on the Lleyn Peninsular.

Here is a link to the current PSS mass build on this forum: PSSA Mass Build 2020 - North American F-86 Sabre | Model Flying

PM Sent.

Martin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Martin

I followed the PSS mass builds of Skyhawks and Hurricanes closely. Amazing how many beautiful models have been built and flown, congratulations for that!

Concerning the P1091 airfoil. The SD6060 is an improvement on the E374 and beneath the S8052 one of my standard airfoils on my 1/12 models. 6060 or 6062 should be perfect on the slope but we have only small hills around around here. So I started searching for an alternative. 8-9% thickness leaves enough space for wing servos, the wing has a depth of 20cm. Interesting candidates could be the HN1033, AG24 for higher perfomance, S7012, S9000 or the AG35 series for easy building. Any other ideas?

Yes Pert, some of the British secret projects would be perfect for an rc model, too. There's just not enough time to build everything...

Timo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AG03 is a great airfoil, but with 6% a bit thin for the 109. I flew it the first time on a small DLG glider and it's amazing. The next models have been the small indoor/outdoor Druine Turbulent and the 1/12 Ohka. It's fast and slow, suitable for very low Reyonold numbers, easy to build and there are no nasty habits. The best proof that from time to time it's worth to try a new airfoil.

Timo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...