Jump to content

Not enough power?


Recommended Posts

This doesn't seem like enough power to me, my set-up is as follows:

2 x HobbyKing FC 28-12 1534Kv brushless outrunners

2 x 30A HobbyKing ESC's

2 x 8 x 4 Aerostar composite props

The ESC's are connected to a Y lead with the red wire cut on one of them, the battery feeds the ESC's in parallel. With a wattmeter connected I'm getting 106 watts at full throttle, drawing 16A. I'm assuming, given how the battery is wired, that this is the sum total of both motors?

The AUW of the model, a TwinStar, is around 1300g in new money so a tad under 3lbs and I doubt this is anywhere near enough power.

What am I doing wrong, how can I get more power?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that you see 106W at 16A, you have around 6.6v at the power meter. This indicates that you are using (if LiPo batteries) a 2S arrangement. If you have a 3S battery, there is something seriously wrong....

You might try a 3S battery and ensure that it has a good enough C rating. You might to well with a 300W power draw, so as a yardstick.. a 3S battery capable of supplying 30A without breaking a sweat. I like to overspec mine, so I'd look for a battery that will give 30A at around 60% of its C rating, so a full rating of 50A minimum.. for example a 2200mAh 3s 25C battery would work, or a smaller capacity at a higher C rating...

 

oops...    more answers appeared whilst typing... 

 

Edited By David Hall 9 on 05/10/2019 17:19:11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What battery are you using? LiPo? 2S?, 3S?, 4S?. Those props are quite small. You can get more power either by upping the voltage (eg going to 3S from 2S) or increasing prop diameter or pitch.

Had a look at the motors and they're only rated at 10 amps with a 3S LiPo so that's only about 100 watts each with a 7x4 prop or a bit more (150 watts) with a 7x6. They seem a bit marginal for a Twinstar weighing 1.3kg but would probably fly it.

btw your assumption is correct. The 16 amps is divided to the 2 motors so the total power is 16 x battery voltage. So I'm guessing your battery voltage is only 6.25 volts which is only a 6 cell NiMH or a 2S LiPo just about fully discharged. So I guess you need more volts.

Sorry this is a bit rambling - I was thinking aloud

Geoff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the same motors as the Emax CF 28-12 1534kv which are rated at about 16A max I believe. With the 7x 6 prop and a 3s LiPo you should get about 150w (?) each, - without melting the motors. This is a bit hypothetical but I will try later today and get back to you, hopefully....

You could try the 8x4 props on 3s but the amps might be a little high. Best to test it with a watt meter if you you have one. If you pull too many amps for too long you will need new motors. crying

Edited By Piers Bowlan on 05/10/2019 17:48:50

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connected a three cell 2200 LiPo, wow, what a difference!

Now putting out 314 watts and pulling 28 amps with the 8 x 4 props (14 amps per motor so still within safety margins)?

I'm guessing the TwinStar would fly quite nicely on half throttle, if so, what would be my approx. duration?

Edited By Stephen Belshaw on 05/10/2019 19:43:25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, some very good advice. I will look to swap the props, I'm using the 8 x 4's as they are all I have - as I'm predominantly a glider guider I don't have a stock of these things!

 

Would there be any advantage in running the two motors in opposite rotation to each other, I understand it is often done on twins?

Edited By Stephen Belshaw on 06/10/2019 05:45:59

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some twins have counter rotating propellers (P38 Lightening, Piper Seminole) because of the engine out case, so that there is not a critical engine (the resultant torque/yaw/roll effect & p-factor is the same), regardless of which engine fails.

The Vought V173 had inward rotating props to reduce the drag caused by the wing tip vortices.

You could try it but if you break one you will need two spares, just in case!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen

The benefit of counter rotating props really comes down to the planes power to weight ratio.

For example the props on the DH Mosquito rotated the same way but the smaller lighter and even more powerful DH Hornet had counter rotating.

It is normal to have them rotating 'over the top towards the fuselage' so if an engine fails the torque of the good engine tends to lift the wing of the dead engine making control a bit easier.

Whilst an electric motor failure is not that common all models do usually have more power for their weight than full size. To make matters worse even modest powered electric motors will produce a substantial torque from low revs, considerably more than a similar power IC engine can, so counter rotating props do eliminate the torque effects from suddenly applying full power in a panic when you are flying low, slow and near the ground.

Its a more common situation than you might think! wink 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...