Here is a list of all the postings Michael Ramsay-Fraser has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
Perhaps we should throw the Geeks to the sharks??
And at which point did I suggest that there WAS interference with 'open and fair' debate? I actually said I thought there were better options on how to deal with the original problem so surely that is supporting the debate, not interfering with it?
Nor did I suggest there was any connection between this thread and the Brexit one. I was only raising my personal concerns.
Similarly, I don't think either Kim, John or myself suggested that this forum was at fault, if fault it was, in Electric Boogaloo emailing the local council. I think the comments were directed at that particular poster, not the forum.
I rather think it is you, BEB that hasn't thought out your comment.
Personally, I have to agree with Kim Taylor & John Soper on this one.
Phil 9 is, I think, confusing the quite correct concerns mentioned on this forum with the (apparent) email to Havant BC from Electric Boogaloo, which, I too, feel was a highly inappropriate action and could impact on the wider modeling community in that area.
There have been plenty of other more appropriate suggestions on how to deal with what, I agree, is very bad practice and, of course, am uncertain on whether any were followed up.
Like the recent 'ban' on political discussion under the 'Brexit' thread, this discussion has left me feeling a bit disillusioned with this forum. It's probably just my desire to see open and fair debate but I can't help feeling things are becoming a little bit censorious.
Whilst I feel the OP was intended to be contentious, particularly on point 3, I don't believe political debate should be frowned upon by the forum or the moderators.
Why not ban posts on rugby (widely posted on last year during the RWC) or the TdF, another popular post with some? Now I enjoy both of these subjects but appreciate that many may not but I don't feel a need to ban them from forums.
Like many, I am a member of numerous forums and all of them, without exception, allow active debate on a diverse range of subjects and not just the topic of the forum. I would hate to see the thought police take over on this one.
|Thread: Kit builders, what would you like???|
Like Lorenz, I too would not choose a Mossie over a Whirlwind particularly if it came with veneered wings etc. As I stated earlier in this thread, I enjoy the build more than anything so if I was going for a Mossie, the TN design would probably be my kit of choice or perhaps the BT version for which I think I have the plan somewhere.
However, my feeling is that if you launched a Mossie and then followed it up with a Whirlwind, I doubt many would buy both. Personally, I'd have one or the other, not both.
I'd still prefer to see the Whirlwind as the twin offering and, yes, I'd probably buy one even if it did come with veneered parts. I just love the design.
|Thread: Goodbye Farewell|
Scotland from the UK?
|Thread: Fastest jet seen on my travels|
He certainly must have good eyesight. I spent half the video thinking a spot on my screen was the plane! My brain could never keep up with that.
|Thread: 3ch slow fly trainer|
Chapter 1 can be built as a 3 ch I believe. Wood packs too. Either that or Jemima, a nice easy build.
|Thread: Kit builders, what would you like???|
I wasn't refering to yourself, Jon and I appolgise if I gave that impression.
It was a reaction to other posters(of which there have been a few) who have suggested a design to suit a particular Laser engine.
To my mind, the design process works the other way round. Design a kit and then see what engine or engines are most appropriate.
Im not knocking Laser or any other brand of i/c engine, I'm just trying to make the point that electric seems to be the popular choice.
With all due respect to Jon, I don't think the decision on which model to kit should be made on a particular brand of i/c engine.
As Richard admits, the majority of his kits are sold for electric power, not i/c so surely the decision should be made on commercial grounds, not on a particular engine.
Warbird replicas, at least as far as I can see, have an ideal set-up with their motor for the Spit and it would make sense to capitalise on the existing technolgy plus it has a proven sales track record.
I don't have an aversion to i/c power but it must make more sense to go where the sales are at least as far as the kit is concerned.
I know I proposed the Whirlwind earlier in this thread and would certainly buy one if a kit were to be produced (provided it didn't comprise of half a dozen bits and some polystyrene) but how about a Northrop Black Widow as a second option?
Off topic, I know but please let me know how you get on with it. I have one waiting to be started (along with the Balsacraft Spit, TN Spit & Typhoon. Too many planes, not enough hours ((used to be girls ))
Lets just forget the Gladiator and stick with the Whirlwind. That would get my vote and a commitment to purchase provided the cost was reasonable.
On the idea of getting a certain number of people to commit to a purchase and providing enough agree to make the project viable, why not ask for a small deposit? Say £20-£30.00?
This would have the benefit of tying people into their committment and eventual purchase as well as helping offset any development and tooling costs.
I only suggest this because, as a member of the classic car fraternity, I've seen any number of well-intentioned individuals being hung out to dry because they've undertaken to finance the production of no longer available parts or manufacture them themselves on the strength of club members saying 'yes, I'll have one of those please' only to find interest waning when payment was required.
Well, given the name, Warbird Replicas, I would suggest staying away from civilian craft.
I'm always tempted by the Warbirds Spitfire as it looks to be a proper builders model but having a TN Spitfire and an old Balsacraft one still waiting to be built, I don't think I could justify another.
For my part, the building is the real pleasure I get from this hobby so anything WW1 or 2 would be fine as long as it has built up wings. and at a scale that allows a reasonable level of detail. Twin would be good too, particularly a German one. There are plenty of varients to choose from and one basic model that could allow adaptations for different types or marks would be briliant. Not asking much, i know.
If I was to choose one, though, it would have to be a Whirlwind.
|Thread: Whats App, Where is The Profit?|
And precisly the reason I don't use any of them.
|Thread: Models & Dioramas|
Not sure if this site has been mentioned before but having looked through it, I thought it might be of interest to some. It certainly facinated me.
Static models, of course but the level of detail in some of them is fantastic. Lots of good historical background too.
Sorry, don't know how to do the linky thing.
Edited By Michael Ramsay-Fraser on 08/04/2016 14:08:04
|Thread: A step too far..................|
Here's another one.
|Thread: Six Nations Rugby Union 2016|
Nobody on to thank Scotland for handing England the championship?
Probably the best game of the tournament so far.
To be frank, an England win would do Scotland a favour.
I don't think I was suggesting taking the possibility of concussion lightly. I was simply saying Jones's comments were ill judged and don't have a place in Rugby. It's perfectly ok to express concern for a player but to suggest that players parents should be concerned is just wrong. I think any rugy players parents have some degree of concern. I certainly do when my son takes the field but I wouldn't appreciate someone pointing it out at a press conference.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!