Here is a list of all the postings Nightflyer has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
|Thread: TN Folland Gnat|
|Thread: RCM&E April 2020 issue chat|
|Thread: TN Folland Gnat|
Love the build myself and my son are both building TN Mini Jets. I have recently found time to start the Gnat while my son has started the Hunter.
We are both using the FMS 3S unit and while I am finishing the Gnat as a Red Arrows one, the Hunter is going for camo finish, but have considered it being finished in silver.
Both aircraft types lend themselves to many options on colour scheme.
Both should be finished in time for some decent flying weather - I hope.
|Thread: Rhapsody plan - old thermal e glider from balsa cabin|
|Thread: Elan 100 Build|
Really interested in the comments about the Elan during the build and 100S competition. I like a number of others on here am disappointed how competitions are now spoilt bi the hi-tech approaches.
I have a Balsa Cabin Ravello that I built some years a go now that I still enjoy flying, and while some of the more modern designs and materials used make for good performing gliders they are not as much fun. Perhaps that discourages others from having a go?
Or maybe I am getting old lol.
|Thread: 2020 Southern Show cancelled|
It is a shame and hopefully it will not suffer next year when the event is held next. Always very hard especially when circumstances are beyond the organisers control.
As to the debate about gate and stallholder fees, it is extremely rare that any event does not cost to organise, even if the landowner waives any fees, organisers still have to cover things such as insurance, toilets, emergency service support etc. The effort and pressures deter many, which tends to leave the position of a few clubs etc who want to help boost their club coffers and interest etc being likely organisers.
Personally, having been involved in organising model shows or events it is often the case that many fail to understand the depth of time, effort, etc required and we should be thankful there are people and clubs etc who do, as otherwise there would be hardly any shows or events. THANK YOU TO THOSE WHO DO ORGANISE OR PROVIDE SUPPORT TO SUCH EVENTS.
|Thread: CAA Registration Impact on STEM Activities|
Educational bodies such as schools do not appear to be aware in this instance, and nor potentially are STEM bodies supporting the schools.
I agree with your comments on the Educational Lead and about the educational value in taking students through the registration process.
I suspect that as far as the 'Educational Lead's' are concerned that they are mainly rank and file teachers who don't have an outside work interest in model flying which does not help matters, but equally is possibly why we such limited promotion of after school hours activities for students these days in a number of activity areas.
However, as far as industry STEM bodies possibly now refusing to support projects. It is as much about the almighty mess made in the reporting, visibility and guidance of registration that has led to the adoption of a negative position.
It might help be offset if there is increased visibility or liaison by BMFA Education Co-Ordinators.
I know that in many instances opportunities only exist for activities in part by school/college/education staff being prepared to go the extra mile and the support of industry and sporting bodies that anything much happens these days.
I know! We are all fed up with all the chat about registration etc. However, despite myself and I am sure others who raised their concerns about impacting STEM activities, I wonder how many are seeing the fallout now registration is live?
So I am a STEM Ambassador within my organisation, and talking to a fellow colleague they advised me of a project they are supporting for a local school. Said project is to design and build a model aircraft that can carry a camera. The team have been working on it since just before the announcement of the requirements, and are building their model. A lot of good work had been done by them to date. When I mentioned the need for Operator registration etc they were surprised.
This prompted communications within my organisation (which is multi-national) and there had been a general awareness and guidelines to avoid undertaking any such projects that involve model aircraft when registration requirements became more public.
I will not go in depth on this as there are some ongoing discussions but wondered how many others are involved in STEM and have already come across problems?
From what has come to light from within our own STEM people and liaisons with other organisations there are some issues and concerns for the future of STEM activities involving model aircraft.
Not all STEM individuals or organising bodies are aware of the registration.
Not all schools or colleges are aware of the need for registration.
Organisations supporting STEM activities are already blocking any such model aircraft based projects.
Responsibility for registration of operators? Should it be the project team/teacher and/or STEM support from industry, etc?
Apparently a few projects have already been blocked and sadly the team's enthusiasm lost as a consequence. This is not good for encouraging the next generation of engineers be it in model flying, aerospace, or engineering in general.
It would be good to know whether others have already encountered such issues and how they have overcome them. Equally I wonder if bodies such as the BMFA are already aware of the impact that is emerging?
|Thread: Forum 2020 Mass Build discussion.|
Definitely the Gnat for me and Hunter for my son. I suspect that the Lightning and Hawk will follow although want to also do the Provost.
|Thread: TN Hunter Plus|
Glad its the TN Mini Jets. I am about to start the Gnat for myself, and my son has the Hunter.
Amen from me on that. The BMFA gets a lot of stick at times but knowing of other battles in the past such as CB days etc I think they have managed a fair degree of damage (nee political) limitation which is not easy. One must hope that in time the government sees the ludicrous need and reverts back to previous practice.
In the meantime, well done BMFA I continue my membership and may everyone have a quiet and joyful Christmas.
|Thread: Ed Kazmirski Taurus Aerobatic model|
Thanks for that info kc I always loved the Taurus as a youngster in my early years, and might have to build one for the fun of it.
|Thread: Merry Christmas|
Wishing everyone a very Merry Christmas and wishes for the new year. May we all get fair weather and lots of flying in.
|Thread: BMFA numbers. Is this true, or a gross exaggeration?|
Some very interesting and wide ranging comments. Realistically, the world and society evolves and changes. There are many other distractions for spare time these days, and some of the fascination in technologies i.e. aerospace lose some appeal. My son is very much a product of the modern era, yet he is interested in model flying and rc especially and is learning to fly because while he ight fly simulators etc he has seen that it is still very different doing the real thing. Numbers decline also, for things like cost of living, family priorities, etc, etc, etc.
One time, amateur radio was seen as popular and challenging (and also led to a number of people doing both radio and model flying, but these days there are far fewer people because communication is a lot easier by other ways and people cannot experiment like they used to, amongst various reasons.
Model flying has evolved and it is probably fair to say there are far fewer builders from scratch/plan or basic kit. Yet at the same time there is now a sizeable number who derive pleasure from ARTF's, and there are perceived to be fewer challenges to grab peoples attention or desire. Yet model flying has evolved a lot over the decades and is likely to continue to evolve.
|Thread: David Vaughan P-51B|
I can't help following this thread out of interest, and must say the idea of the BMFA exhibiting some of David's creations as massively appealing, as along with separately perhaps those of some of the other greats like Mick Reeves for example.
As pointed out already the detailing on models has been superb over the years and really did take off from the mid/late 70's onwards I think in this country. Articles written by the likes of David, Mick, Brian Taylor and Gordon Whitehead I think re-focused many of us in efforts to detail our scale and even semi-scale models.
Aside from reminding those of us who were inspired originally, it might also newer generations?
Ah TSR2 another example of what happens when politicians meddle in things like aviation, the navy, army, roads, rail ....
|Thread: What are your three favourite war movies?|
My favourite three:
Battle of Britain
The Cruel Sea
The Dam Busters
Three others close behind being:
The Longest Day
|Thread: Veneer lifting problems|
I have found that where the veneer has split or lifted that using copydex gives a stronger bond than PVA. This was advice I was given back in the early 80's when making and repairing foam wings, and has worked for me all these years when necessary. I always use dome weights to help hold the veneer down for a day or so to ensure a strong reliable bond.
With regard to finishing the wing I would opt for using glass cloth and epoxy resin rather than dope and nylon as if the wood is old it is likely to have more open pores allowing dope through to attack the foam.
|Thread: 2019 Special Issue|
Personally I felt that the special is special as it is different from the normal issues. This is how it should be (thinking back in the past to such specials that set aside normal magazine content). Great work to the team for this month and I think it just goes to show there are many options for the builder and you do not need to have artf's or foamies.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!