Here is a list of all the postings GONZO has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
|Thread: CAA announce New drone trials !|
Their not going to do that, they want your money. I would suggest more, much more than at the moment. Site assessment fees, site registration fees(annual), operator fees(still wanted and increasing),possible test fees, I'm sure people can think of more.
Steve J, you'll probably be the best person, although others may know, to answer this question. I know our and Europe's regulations have been generated by EASA and this came from a declaration(Riga?). But, as there is a world wide similar/coordinated drive to regulate and control 'drones' did this movement start from some international body possibly linked to the UN by any chance?
Nothing useful to say, best say nothing.
But your next post would seem to indicate that it has been made workable in two countries(France and Ireland) and therefore could be made workable in the USA and also here.
Steve J, are you that optimistic that you believe, given the past history of DfT/CAA, that comes 'remote identification' here it will not be at least as bad. I regretfully do not share that optimism if that is the case.
I see no reason for optimism when it comes to the way we'll be treated in the UK, in fact quit the opposite. Amongst many other incidents that displays the attitude towards modellers take the registration(tax) situation. USA $5(less than £4) for 3 years; UK was to be £16.50(just under $21.50) dropped to £9(just under $12) but for only 1 year. Even with the reduced fee(tax) it still means we pay 7X the USA rate. IMO the attitude will continue with remote identification for UK models.
Edited By GONZO on 28/12/2019 08:54:16
Mr MPW You only have to view a few of this chaps(school operator and owner) videos to see that all this system of rules and regulations is orientated towards multi rotors and commercial/business operations. IMO he seems to be almost salivating at the thought of extra cash flow.
NOT a SUAV This is not a remote control model. Rather it is a sub 70kg foot launched aircraft with the flight controls operated via a RC Tx. Of course if he took it off his back and flew it 3rd person LOS then it would fall under the requirements of DRES. But, as shown and if flown in this country no licence, no registration, no test, etc . Just buy/make and fly.
Fit these drones with LIDAR(already been done in other countries) and you can monitor the UK and its inhabitants in ALL manner of ways.
|Thread: The Gov't, CAA, BMFA & UAV legislation thread|
Exactly, plus I thought I'd give CL a try as I've never done it. 1st July and the 'flavour' of discussions .should give an idea of the way things may be going
If they have any information gathering device 'fitted'(doesn't have to be used) like a camera/microphone then you will have to register and pay the model tax.
Steve J well a quick scan of that document confirms, at least to me, that the majority of us are just required for now to help with the set up costs. In a few years most of us will be squeezed out, seen as an inconvenience, by increased regulation and cost unless some special provisions are made. I know my view does not find favour with most on here but then this has been my view from the start when everyone believed nothing was going to change. I hope time proves me wrong and others right.
Competent is generally used to define ones ability/skill as a pilot and should not be conflated with the CAA 's 'high jacking' of the term to describe their test.
Lets expand this theoretical incident to include a situation less 'black and white' where a member, who you know did not register as an operator, is flying a plane you suspect is 1/ slightly over the 250gm limit(small foamy) and 2/ could in your visual assessment be about 500gm(open structure vintage'ish). What do you do? Do you have some scales with you? Are you going to photograph the plane and club member then start a full inquiry with the club committee? Are you going to push the committee to start a process of weighing planes and keeping records? These possible situations are fraught with problems. From causing bad feeling when the accusation is wrong to possible physical confrontation.
My word, I've got to put my stick in the hornets nest and give it a good poke. Give people an opportunity to don their 'jobsworth' hats and become little official inspectors and their off. The BMFA made it perfectly clear in one of their news letters: (I'll para phrase slightly) NO POLICING BY THE BMFA, NO POLICING BY THE CLUBS, ITS PERSONAL RESPOSABILITY. Why make more work/potential trouble for ourselves?
Have you ever used that? I have and you generally wait at least 4hr for a response, generally its the next day if at all. Most times now the police don't even respond to a burglary 999 call, they just give you a crime number.
Sub 250gm site/airspace/distance requirements are contained in the table on page 32 of CAP 1789 (with no agreed concessions it starts 1/7/2020)
BMFA advised against this in a previous news letter. They also said that they, the BMFA, would not participate in any 'policing' of the DRES
My A cert will be 40 years old comes April 2020
Alan, I'm not saying you should not comply with DRES if your personal balance of desire against principle so decrees. It's just the eagerness that has been displayed, contrary to the BMFA advice. Its the, and this will upset some but it gets the point over, attitude of when officialdom say 'jump' some shout "me first sir, me first sir, how high how high" when there is no legal reason to do anything until January as advised by our national body the BMFA. I have the attitude of when officialdom says 'jump' I question why, when and what purpose does my jumping serve. Then I consider whether I will or I will not jump. I've known from an early age that my personality is problematic in certain situations that require one to just 'do', like the armed forces or the police etc.
John, thanks for your concern.
John, as always I'm not telling anyone what to think just reporting on a conversation and what I think.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!