By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

Member postings for GONZO

Here is a list of all the postings GONZO has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.

Thread: Old Keil Kraft kits
15/01/2020 19:44:40

Steven Jones, a tracing of the larger parts(fuselage, wings, etc) and photo copies of the smaller parts put together and submitted to Outerzone would be welcomed by all of us. The guy who runs the site can do quite a lot with the info/plans/drawings he receives. I myself have submitted various plans and books. Its good to get all we can saved and made available to all before it gets lost in the mists of time. If you contact him by email he'll advise what is required contact

Thread: New FPV microcam/FPV cam 31 gms, water resistant
13/01/2020 22:59:30

Google 'Freemake Video Converter', and 'Freemake Video Downloader' if you want to 'rip' YouTube videos.

Thread: The Gov't, CAA, BMFA & UAV legislation thread
06/01/2020 06:52:57
Posted by i12fly on 05/01/2020 21:39:37:

Only muppets won't register -it could damage the good work of the BMFA and jeopardise the next stage

devil cheeky wink

OK, I'll get my coat

and those who only fly CL and/or sub 250g? Or, do you class these people the same?

Edited By GONZO on 06/01/2020 06:53:22

05/01/2020 19:46:46

It equates to it exactly. In both instances if you have doubts about the legality of either then the correct approach is to report it to some one who has the authority to insist on proof of legal compliance. Taking the law into ones own hands can give rise to derision at best and unforeseen potentially unpleasant events at worst..

05/01/2020 18:11:27

Further to my previous post. The correct procedure would be for any club member, including committee members, to call the police and report a possible infringement. As just members of the general public no one has the right to demand any information/proof from any one else, they do not have that authority. They can only request and if the request is not granted report it to the authorities.

05/01/2020 17:59:21

Ha Ha john. But, as can be seen from some attitudes expressed here it will cause an atmosphere of mistrust and suspicion and possibly anger at the field. I can see a situation where some one is flying a sub 250g plane and then being ordered to prove it is sub 250g. In that situation I would demand that they in return prove their car is insured, taxed and if necessary MOT'ed as I will be using the same roads as them. This is the very reason why the BMFA stated that neither they or the affiliated clubs would be policing the legislation.

05/01/2020 17:29:50

You only have to have your models labeled up with your reg number when you FLY it, not just to own it and keep it at home or have it in the car or even at the flying field. It does not infringe the legislation unless it is flown without you being registered as the operator, the number on the model and you having attained a competency qualification.. The key action is FLYING the model.

Thread: FrSky Taranis - user chat
05/01/2020 12:40:54

Thanks.

Thread: The Gov't, CAA, BMFA & UAV legislation thread
05/01/2020 11:26:56

Martin_K, AFAIK there is no 'Air traffic management used by maned aviation' unless it is in controlled airspace(commercial main airports, air lanes etc) and that would be by commercially qualified pilots flying suitably equipped aircraft. GA manned flying in open airspace is 'uncontrolled'. As an example from when I was flying planes out of a farm strip in East Anglia I rarely spoke to anyone on the radio and the plane did not have a transponder. I flew all over the East of England and frequently flew to the Isle of Wight for a day out. When I flew to Holland I took off and filled my flight plan over the radio, a requirement to file a flight plan as I was transiting international flight regions. But, I was not directed or controlled throughout my flight by any ground based controller. It seems to me that there is a push to impose a very much tighter control on UAV's than manned flight.

Thread: FrSky Taranis - user chat
05/01/2020 11:04:49

I have a Taranis on a very early OpenTx. Can I use this multi protocol module used in the Jumper T16 Jumper 4 in 1 SE Multi protocol in my X9D Taranis after updating the OpenTx. I presume that this module is derived from the one in the RCGroups thread DIY Multiprotocol Tx Module (over a 1000 pages of info and things get buried).

TIA

Thread: The Gov't, CAA, BMFA & UAV legislation thread
05/01/2020 09:19:37

Why are people so keen to check on their fellow fliers, acting as unofficial/un paid police and take on the responsibility of enforcement of this pointless legislation? Even to the extent of asking, no demanding that they prove their compliance! Do you check your neighbours car tires to make sure they are legal. Do you ask/demand he prove he is insured/taxed/ has a valid MOT when you see him getting in his car. I would suggest that the car situation is of a more important nature than this idiotic registration as thousands die on the roads each year when not even one dies from a modelling accident on the flying field.

05/01/2020 09:01:26

The threat effect is what it was designed to do. That and the checking on other modellers by modellers and snitching on them or ostracising them, as demonstrated by the attitudes displayed in this thread. It's all in the best traditions of a totalitarian communist state of the cold war era where neighbours and even family members spied on each other and then denounced them to the state.

04/01/2020 21:16:02

Do you not drive? There are people who do not wish to insure/tax/have an MOT on their cars that drive on the roads. Are you not going to drive because of that. The probability of an uninsured accident whilst driving is very much higher than having an accident whilst flying, that's why model accident insurance is so low. Been at this since the mid 70's and have never seen or had an accident worthy of a claim.

Thread: Hobby Porter
03/01/2020 16:01:47

Decided it was worth a punt so ordered one. I've also been looking at the ZOHD Kopilot from Banggood ZOHD Kopilot Looks to be similar but without the D8R Rx compatible integrated in the main package. Both items are dedicated fixed wing items which I think may prove useful in stabilising sub 250g planes.Tempted to get the ZOHD Dart FPV ZOHD Dart The FPV version comes with everything except Rx and batteries. No registration required until 1/7/20 then to stay legal would have to remove FPV camera. I've done a search on here but no threads on the ZOHD Kopilot but 'Painless360' on YouTube has done some videos on it 5 videos.

02/01/2020 16:32:05

Hobby Porter

The FR810 is an 8ch flight controller with GPS and a built in FrSky D8R compatible Rx. Rx + GPS 18.8gm total weight. Looks interesting as its designed for fixed wing. Could be useful for sub 250gm 400ft distance limit with its 'geo-fencing', 'return to home' and 'loiter' capability??

Anyone have any experience or info on it?

Edited By GONZO on 02/01/2020 16:32:43

Thread: CAA announce New drone trials !
29/12/2019 18:25:15

Steve J, thanks for the link. I'm sure I remember some larger organisation that dealt with the rules and regulations for all forms of aviation, jet passenger down to light aviation, internationally/world wide.

29/12/2019 18:20:05
Posted by Gary Manuel on 29/12/2019 17:41:41:
Posted by Steve J on 29/12/2019 09:09:39:
Posted by Alan Gorham_ on 28/12/2019 23:33:16:

Is this not a solution?

Listing long standing sites in section ENR 5.5 of the Aeronautical Information Publication would make more sense to me (they do this in a few neighbouring countries). The 13 sites with permission for 7+kg over 400ft are already listed in the AIP.

Absolutely agree. Let each model flying site be registered as a no fly zone for all other aircraft. We fly inside the zone and others keep well away from it. This would by the way also make model / flyer registration even more pointless.

Their not going to do that, they want your money. I would suggest more, much more than at the moment. Site assessment fees, site registration fees(annual), operator fees(still wanted and increasing),possible test fees, I'm sure people can think of more.

28/12/2019 16:09:33

Steve J, you'll probably be the best person, although others may know, to answer this question. I know our and Europe's regulations have been generated by EASA and this came from a declaration(Riga?). But, as there is a world wide similar/coordinated drive to regulate and control 'drones' did this movement start from some international body possibly linked to the UN by any chance?

28/12/2019 16:02:53

Nothing useful to say, best say nothing.

28/12/2019 15:50:36

Bruce Simpsons rant on this

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
CML
Sussex Model Centre
electricwingman 2017
Slec
Advertise With Us
Sarik
Latest "For Sale" Ads
NEW POLL - has the pandemic altered your event safety perceptions?
Q: Has the covid pandemic deterred you from attending shows and events in 2021?

 No, I'll be attending just as many as I usually do
 No, but I'll choose my event with greater care
 Yes, I'll attend fewer events going forward
 Yes, I wont attend any where previously I have

Latest Reviews
Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues

Contact us

Contact us

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!

Find RCM&E!