Here is a list of all the postings Andy Blackburn has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
|Thread: Taranis 9 channel|
+1 for the X9D - I think it's an ex-JR case, sits very nicely in the hands, sticks are good and you can get some hall-sensor gimbals if you really feel the need to spend the money. One thing that really helped me with the programming was the Open Tx User Manual - I can't stand trying to learn stuff from videos...
|Thread: Ripmax Phase 5e|
I've got one, but when presented with a nice new shiny thing...
I've just had a look at the instructions; it looks as though it should be possible to make a new nose from balsa & ply that replaces the cowl and spinner, and is attached using new M3 bolt holes through the existing firewall, with hex-head M3 bolts screwed in from the inside of the fuselage using a ball-hex driver. Subject to seeing the kit and finding some film of the right colour, I think I might have just talked myself into that, actually...
Edited By Andy Blackburn on 09/05/2019 21:15:30
Had the same thought myself - it looks quite nice.
|Thread: CAA registration consulation|
I've written to all of the required recipients, although Baroness Vere and Richard Moriarty both got real letters sent via recorded delivery because i think that has a bit more impact.
I also wrote to the All Party Parliamentary Group on GA, and within an hour had received an encouraging response from James Shipp; I think they are on our side. He finished by saying "...I would urge you and your colleagues to respond to CAP 1775 to make sure the CAA is aware of the strength of feeling on this issue". So it probably will make a difference, I think.
I've written to my MP using www.writetothem.com ; it might or might not do any good, but it made me feel better.
Edited By Andy Blackburn on 29/04/2019 15:47:18
I've also filled-in the consultation document (politely but firmly).
|Thread: Wash out|
I assume that it's there to control how sharp or soft the stall feels to the pilot (I assume you're talking about the full size)?
But if I were you, I'd do exactly what it says in the instructions. If you don't put the washout in, you'll effectively be increasing the wing incidence which is not what the designer intended.
BTW, I think you'll find that the full-size J-3 is normally rigged with about 1.8 - 2.5 degrees of washout...
|Thread: JR resurrection?|
I agree with what's been said; given the competition I'd balk at paying half the proposed asking price. I think the problem is that JR was seen as a premium (and expensive) brand but they're not a premium brand anymore, unfortunately.
|Thread: Andy Conway Bae Hawk|
I've built three of these with several wing sectons (can't help myself), and they're very, very nice. In my experience, they do need either a) washout, or b) the wing fences installed.
|Thread: PSS Jet Provost|
> I was wondering if the washout on the JP could be 'blended' into the tip tanks to make it look more scale-like ?
Yes, that's what was done on the small one - the tip tank is (or should be!) at the right angle for scale, the washout isn't noticeable.
> I don't think the plan is 'Ron Collins' but, it is a Mark 5. Target weight was around 3-4 lbs if I remember the magazine article correctly. Does this seem ok for wing loading ?
If it's 48" span, then bearing in mind you said that you wanted a "light, but strong airframe that can be ballasted" then 3 lb is probably OK, at a guess. It also depends what slope you fly from - if it's a brick lifter then I wouldn't worry too much, but if you fly from a more normal slope then I'd aim for a wing loading of 15-16 oz/sq ft. You might well have to use some light wood to get that, though.
> On the slope, I'm wondering about a Selig 7055 or Eppler 205 /374 section ?
Depends on the size, and on what you want. The small Jet Provost wing section is Selig S7055 which works well at that size, it thermals and climbs well but the wing section seems to limit the top speed. Eppler E205 is faster but seems to require a decently-sized wing chord to work properly, I hesitate to speculate but I'd say something around 8-9 inches chord would work well. E374 is similar but a bit faster, and hasn't got a nearly flat rear profile so it can't be built flat on the bench.
One other thing, though - the small JP has a little bit of washout (a degree, from memory) and it normally behaves itself in the tip-stall department; I urge you to at least consider the possibility that a little bit of washout might be a good thing...
(P.S. If it's Ron Collins' plan for a JP Mark 5 that you have, I think it's Eppler 374...)
|Thread: Slowing down a Boomerang II trainer|
There's not a lot wrong with a Boomerang as a trainer.
However, many trainers are set-up with a forward c.g. (particularly if one has erred on the side of caution), one side-effect of which is that they may tend to fly a little fast once they're trimmed for the glide (as it's electric and you're thinking it's a bit fast, I'm guessing that the throttle will be closed for most or all of the approach).
I suggest, therefore, that you experiment with moving the c.g. back a little bit at a time - nothing bad will happen because it has a nice, square wing. If you move it back far enough you'll notice the elevator is a bit more sensitive, but you can reduce the throw slightly to compensate, and carry on.
|Thread: Canberra by Andy Blackburn PSS|
That's really great news Pete.
+1 for pictures.
Pete, that looks really good.
> What is the wind range Andy?
I've not found the wind speed limits yet, because every time I've chucked it off a slope it's flown OK.
All slopes are different of course and will provide different amounts of lift with the same windspeed, so it's difficult to give any hard limits. However, it will fly higher in the same lift than my light-ish 2nd Jet Provost (silver and dayglo) and Hawk T1a (the grey one, SD6060 wing) so if a JP or Hawk will gain height, then the Cranberry should do too. I've chucked the first prototype JP (slightly lighter) off the Orme in a lot less than 10 mph and that took a bit of concentration, but it did gain height.
Having said all that, though, you really need a decent amount of lift for a maiden in case you need to sort things out so I'd just go with what you're happy with.
I've used JR and then Spektrum, but I suspect that you use Futaba(?) so this might not make all that much sense, but on my Tx you can either do it using end point adjustment, or on the Tx screen where the dual rates are set-up - you can set-up different amounts of movement for up and down elevator by holding up or down stick whilst adjusting the movement.
I'm afraid I did it on end-point adjustment - something like 100% down and 80% up ...
On the prototype I had the model set-up with two elevator servos exactly as Phil describes above; the only time you need to use a Y-lead is if you haven't got enough channels.
BTW, I also used one channel per aileron so that it was easier to adjust them, so there were a total of 5 channels used:
+ a small amount of aileron-rudder mix as described in the original article, and I think I had about 2:1 aileron differential. Also a small amount (~10%??-ish) of expo to get all the surfaces back to a linear movement with the sticks. Might also have had a little bit extra expo on the elevator because you don't need very much movement at all - it's quite a short-coupled airframe.
Ah! ... Well, that might do it.
Colour scheme starting to look very nice indeed, BTW.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!