Here is a list of all the postings Neil R has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
|Thread: LEMON RX7|
The incompatibility issue is between the Lemon 'plus' model and the DM8 or DM9 spectrum module in a 3rd party Tx. See here, about 1/3 of the way down:
This caught me out a while back, but I can't remember what the servos actually did.
|Thread: Extra Slim Twin|
What’s the thinking please on the separate rudder channels? Driving opposite directions for an air brake effect? This was where I saved my own 9th channel. Mine needs recovering due to sun damage in a poor storage location, but I have a feeling the lockdown might provide an opportunity. If this happens I’ll also be moving to the Taranis.
Edited By Neil R on 20/04/2020 18:43:52
Here's what I went for on mine in terms of mixers - this was on a FF9 - it would have all been so much easier / more flexible on a Taranis. (Unless described as 'always active' below the mixer was on a switch).
Ail Diff always active
Elevator to Flap
Ailevator (for twin elevator servos) always active
Airbrake (crow using ailerons and flap)
Rudder to Throttle (master) for taxying
Throttle (master) to Throttle (slave) always active
Throttle Safety Cut Out
Flap to Elevator always active
Rudder to Throttle (slave) for taxying
Rudder to Throttle (master) for yaw aeros
Rudder to Throttle (slave) for yaw aeros
I think I was trying for a system where the rudder stick increased thrust on the outside engine in taxi mode, and decreased thrust on the inner engine during flight mode..
Mine is electric with 2 Lipos - I made the entire D section of the wing centre section removeable to accommodate them internally in the wing.
|Thread: The Gov't, CAA, BMFA & UAV legislation thread|
I've just received the renewal e-mail from the BMFA. They must like me because I've actually received 25 copies (!) of exactly the same e-mail. Is anyone else getting this?
|Thread: Can't get S8R to stabilise or auto-level|
Another thought prompted by Devcon - did you make the stick movements it needs to calibrate things immediately after the self check "chicken dance" thingy. I think the last I heard was that no throttle movemnent is required, and that it's finally powering off the Rx which saves the settings. Do this stick calibration with rates on full.
Edited By Neil R on 21/06/2018 21:49:03
You didn't mention the gain on Ch 9 - is that also working ok?
|Thread: Flightline 1600mm Spitfires????????|
As discussed above, Motion RC is finally close to arriving in Europe - June I think - and based in the Netherlands.
I just went to their normal US page and it gave me the option of the Euro site (https://www.motionrc.eu/)
Twelve flights in and I'm still very happy with the Spitfire.
|Thread: Steering nose leg does it need trail|
Sorry not helpful - but recently a colleague of mine described the unwelcome manoeuvre as the 'Robin Reliant Roll' - I'd not heard that in an aviation context before, and was quite tickled at how perfectly it fits!
(I'd guess any lowering of the cg would help, but I wouldn't expect that to be practicable).
|Thread: Multiplex Extra 330S vs. 300S|
Here's a quote from the US importer, cut and pasted from another forum:
"The Extra 300S and the Extra 330SC are two totally different airplanes entirely, the new 330SC was designed and built completely from the ground up by a different team that worked directly with Gernot Bruckmann to ensure that the quality, fit, finish, and flight envelope of the airplane were nothing but outstanding in every way. An airplane simply doesn't bear Gernot Bruckmann's name on it unless it meets all of these criteria. If you compare the two models side by side it's very apparent the 330SC is the better of the two.
One notable difference is that the fuselage of the more expensive model has the internal wooden framework.
I think the original price of the 330SC RR was much higher than the £245 I'm seeing now. There's also talk in the other forum that the 300 is discontinued?
|Thread: Flightline 1600mm Spitfires????????|
Pete I saw it post #1275 in the place below (which I suspect I haven't linked properly - sorry!). It's in their 'Electric Warbirds' topic area.
On the same thread post #1274 sets out how MRC work with Flightline.
When funds allow - and being very happy with what I've seen so far of the Spitty (quick damage check only) - I could be very tempted with the large A-10.
I recently spotted this intriguing comment from one of the Motion RC guys on another forum. (Even from Reds the Spitty arrived in a box covered in Motion RC logos - my understanding is that MRC and Flightline / Freewing are really quite joined up).
We care about Europe a lot. We ship anywhere in Europe now and you'll have many more options sometime in Feb or March of 2018.
Pleased to say that mine arrived today (from Reds) - so hopefully things are now unblocking for all. I'm also happy to share your view Rocker that any delay was not the fault of those at the UK end of the chain.
Waiting here too. On order from Sept with Reds RC. Their website seems to slip the date by about half a month every two weeks; it's currently still saying early Dec (and I vaguely remember getting a story about Customs delays). I really hope you're wrong about the New Year! In contrast Motion RC in the US must have had a glut, because I think they recently had a sale on. I really don't want to cancel, because I've already bought some dedicated Lipos and Callie graphics!
|Thread: FrSky Taranis - user chat|
Thanks for the responses all - for just a few quid I think I'll at least order a couple of the longer aerials to try out.
A question which has been prompted by reading the "What's Happening in Futaba" thread, which I think fits better here despite that thread drifting towards the full range characteristics of FrSky (FASST) receivers.
So, regarding Rx installation in bigger models - I've always had a slight concern that the standard FrSky Rx aerials, being reasonably short, are always going to end up quite close together. That makes me think that there's more chance of shielding behind, for example, bigger lumps such as my Zenoah 26 being used in an on-going Sopwith Pup project (where all 'moveable' weight needs to kept forward). The alternative approach of using brands which have additional satellite Rx's feels like it should give a more robust solution.
To achieve a better aerial spacing I've thus been considering buying some of the longer FrSky 'monopole' aerials (40 or 60cm), as currently sold by RCLife. Does anyone else use these, or otherwise think these are a sensible way forward?
Edited By Neil R on 05/02/2016 14:21:56
|Thread: Taranis X9E|
I thought I'd read somewhere that for Chris's option 3, FrSky 'blocked' selecting D8 via their own as-supplied operating system, and not in their underlying RF firmware. And that overwriting the former with OpenTx 'restores' D8?
In case I didn't make it clear in my last post, the 'simple' method of flashing SPort devices using the SD card route is now included by default at the latest OpenTx 2.1.x version. I think it was only in Mike B's special versions up to now. This is the main reason I upgraded.
Regarding the X8Rs - my confidence is not much dented as yet - but I think I am going to try and set up RSSI as a reasonably regular spoken output.
Gonzo - my new X6R (2015 so i presume EU) also bound to a non EU Taranis in D8 mode (i.e. using the Ch 5 to 6 jumper). Again with no servo jitter etc - although I didn't do the range check (and I had nil intention of trying it in flight).
Not sure what that's telling us, apart from you're not in a parallel universe!
I meant to try binding it in D16 mode also, but I forgot to press the fail-safe button when powering up (RTFM!). Unsurprisingly therefore it didn't bind. By the time I'd realised my mistake, I'd already flashed the Rx with the non-EU firmware - which as expected has now bound just fine in D16 mode.
BTW, compared to the process of upgrading to OpenTx 2.1.x (and all the messing needed with it's new Companion download, the as-yet-poorly-documented telemetry changes, and the need to update the sound files), my first go at updating the RF firmware using the new SPort / SD card route was an absolute doddle.
Edited By Neil R on 02/10/2015 17:38:04
Thanks Phil, yes I'd got that. Just didn't want my post to sound like I was being over critical.
And I'm not sure it's the EU firmware that's causing the 'latest' concerns in some of the above links - looks more like FrSky's hardware (the X9E antenna and the odd X9D soldering issue) and the basic X8R receiver design architecture.
Having said that, I've personally decided to stay on non-EU for now, and I've started saving my own copies of downloaded firmwares!
The postman has just delivered me a new (2015) X6R, so, before re-flashing, I'll try tonight and replicate Gonzo's unexpected-binding!
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!