andyh | 07/04/2015 09:06:06 |
![]() 429 forum posts 22 photos | |
Engine Doctor | 07/04/2015 09:29:20 |
![]() 2717 forum posts 44 photos | They look terrific ! I guess it will be some years before they appear in the hobby. I must admit I did check the date on the caption as its THAT time of year. |
malcolm woodcock 1 | 07/04/2015 09:32:47 |
423 forum posts | Only hold 2 volts at the moment but lets hope for progress. |
andyh | 07/04/2015 09:49:13 |
![]() 429 forum posts 22 photos | Posted by Engine Doctor on 07/04/2015 09:29:20:
I must admit I did check the date on the caption as its THAT time of year. same here |
avtur | 07/04/2015 15:31:55 |
![]() 883 forum posts 20 photos | Just seen a piece on Sky News about this, described as having massive potential (sorry ... no pun intended!) but very much in the early stage of development; possibly years away from the high street. They also said that these new cells will be far more robust than lipo and similar technology, this was demonstrated by putting a drill through a cell which was under test; they will also be flexible. Given the potential demand for a new technology I'm sure they'll be working hard to get it to market as soon as possible. Edited By avtur on 07/04/2015 15:36:26 |
John F | 07/04/2015 16:03:47 |
![]() 1316 forum posts 51 photos | Looks like a good battery, if the testing and further R&D is fruitful. Putting a drill through a battery that could potentially only hold 2 volts with no capacity rating stated isn't exactly demonstrating anything significant with regards to safety though. It could only be 10 mAh for all we know. |
Phil Brooks | 07/04/2015 16:40:20 |
![]() 474 forum posts 150 photos | A basic law of physics is that you only get out what you put in. To charge a 2200 mAh battery in one minute you'd be charging at 60C, i.e. 132 Amps. A 5000 mAh pack would need 300Amps. Even if the battery costs are reasonable, we're gonna need some bigger, more expensive chargers! |
John Privett | 07/04/2015 21:05:04 |
![]() 6130 forum posts 243 photos | Just thinking the same Phil! However, I guess, just because you can charge it in a minute doesn't mean you have to. Even charging in 10 minutes would be fast compared to what most of us do now, and require a lower current, though still perhaps more than many chargers will deliver. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!