So what Aircraft would you like to see modelled for this years free plan
|Tony Nijhuis||11/01/2016 13:33:50|
609 forum posts
We haven't conducted a modellers choice for the RCM&E Autumn Special 'Free Plan' for some years now so it would be good to know what's at the top of your 'to build' list so at least we can make some of you guys happy with this years plan subject....
As before, let me know your top three choices and your perferred power source.
|Keith Evans 3||11/01/2016 13:40:22|
|377 forum posts|
Beechcraft Bonanza Vee tailed version .I.C.powered
125 forum posts
A Shoestring SVP or at least at lookalike
|Steve Adams||11/01/2016 13:56:38|
|194 forum posts|
My three choices would be
1) Concorde (EDF or Pusher prop)
2) Vickers Valiant (EDF or Pusher prop)
3) Hawker Siddley Harrier EDF....All mks shown if possible
The top two speak for my whole family as choices as for the recent passing of my mum as my grandad worked at Weybridge Vickers / BAC Surrey. The third choice is a personal favourite of mine...Who doesn't love the Harrier?! With the recent success of your Avro Vulcan and BAE Hawk I have no doubt that your probably the only Designer who could pull any of these off if they are lucky to be chosen!
Many thanks for all of your designs over the years Tony and long may they continue, Good luck to all and happy voting
51 forum posts
An enlargement to your 62 inch Hurricane...something along the lines of the Spit...
|Bob Cotsford||11/01/2016 14:33:46|
8126 forum posts
How about a between wars bipe? Curtis P6E, Boeing F4 or Fiat CR42? Grumman F3?
|Martyn K||11/01/2016 14:39:32|
5032 forum posts
+1 for the bipe - perhaps a Bucker
258 forum posts
Here's my suggestion -
Scottish Twin pioneer - electric and with slats and flaps for real slow landings.
Edited By JohnnyB on 11/01/2016 15:20:01
Edited By JohnnyB on 11/01/2016 15:20:21
|Ken Lighten||11/01/2016 15:28:05|
256 forum posts
My choices would be:
(1) Hawker Hart/Hind/Nimrod
(2) Gloster Gladiator
(3) How about a WW1 Bristol M1C?
50" to 60" span, electric or I.C.
|Bob Cotsford||11/01/2016 15:32:20|
8126 forum posts
I reckon the Grumman F3 really could be a bit of a Bucker!
|Andy Blackburn||11/01/2016 15:40:00|
|510 forum posts|
My two penn'orth:
1. Hawker Hunter, either a late single seater (bigger avon + wing dog-tooth) or a two-seater. EDF/slope.
2. Late model Messerschmitt 109 (G or K) - I've always preferred these to the earlier versions. Either electric or IC.
3. I like the idea of a Gloster Gladiator. IC for preference, but electric is fine.
|John F||11/01/2016 15:52:41|
1318 forum posts
How about making it a celebration of something?
|John Timmis||11/01/2016 15:56:33|
|222 forum posts|
Early jets for 70mm fan.
1 Mig 15
2 Super Sabre
3 HS Gnat
4 Gloster Meteor
Bungy launch is OK.
|6142 forum posts|
all at about 60 inch span
539 forum posts
If I'm allowed, I'll do three suggestions for warbirds and three non-military ones
As for warbirds:
- Messerschmitt BF110 72"
- Arado AR96 64"
- Junkers JU87 Stuka 65"
For non military ones
- GeeBee R3 60"
- Cessna 188 62"
- Lockheed 18 72"
As for powerplant, I'd rather glow but it would be appreciated if it can be built either way
79 forum posts
Sorry about this but .probably it would be easier you to suggest planes you would like to build and to vote three between them.
Anyway: My votes are:
Pilatus PC6 Turbo Porter
Zlin 526 AFS
All of them i.c.
|Martin Harris||11/01/2016 16:34:19|
9024 forum posts
I'd be interested in a SIAI-Marchetti SF.260 - gives a lot of options, aerobatic, military trainer or light attack versions.
|Martyn K||11/01/2016 16:42:36|
5032 forum posts
Those retracts could be fun.. Nice colour schemes though
|Phil Green||11/01/2016 17:10:07|
1538 forum posts
What a lot of beginners want is a trainer that doesnt look like one. Doesnt need to be an accurate scale model but it needs to look like a real aeroplane. Something that can withstand massive simplification, with rudder-elevator, Clark-Y and dihedral without losing the appeal of the original. Easy slab-sided construction and straightforward to fit out. Electric. Needs to avoid the current 'club trainer' look altogether. Several cabin high-wing subjects spring to mind, say a US Army Bird-Dog plus WW1 Eindekkers, D8's and such but theres no reason with electrics not to go that bit further - even a simplified Lanc with two inner motors & dummy outers could be made to be slow, stable & predictable. This isnt an unrealistic proposal for an RC trainer - all these subjects and many more are flown by the free-flight boys.
The problem seems to be that instructors choose which models are used for training, hence the boring 'typical trainer' look and the enforced full-house layout. Give a beginner a stable RET model that looks like a bit like a Spitfire and that he can fly on his own, and he'll be happy.
(ok the Spitfire was tongue-in-cheek...)
Edited By Pete B - Moderator on 11/01/2016 19:00:57
|alan p||11/01/2016 17:15:13|
|230 forum posts|
wingspan 50/60 inches ,fixed u/c, preferably I/c. Keep the cost down and simple systems, the idea is to build a popular model without breaking the bank!!
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!