By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by CML

The Ohmen

My first electric powered aerobatic model

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Peter Miller10/09/2018 13:40:25
9293 forum posts
1086 photos
10 articles
Posted by Peter Miller on 10/09/2018 10:29:09:

OOPs I missed when proofing the plan. Sorry.

If anyone would like PGF files of my original plan. PM me with your email address.

Edited By Peter Miller on 10/09/2018 10:30:05

Of course that should read PDF files

Martin McIntosh12/09/2018 21:07:30
2516 forum posts
948 photos

Very surprised to see a thread on this started so early since it has only just been published in the mag.

I have an unusually empty building board at the moment so I was looking around for something to keep me occupied for a while.

I once built Peter`s Cap 21 which was excellent so I thought about scaling this back up for an OS52S, but not wanting a protruding silencer I found that the exhaust systems I have for the motor would not allow this.

I have a TGY 3548 and an AXI 2820/14 doing nothing and fit the power requirements so saw sense and have almost decided to have a go at it `as is`.

Will keep you posted on the results of my effort.

Jon Robb12/09/2018 22:09:23
5 forum posts

After a recommendation to build this model on a thread I posted recently, I to am looking to build this model in the near future. I’ll be looking forward to seeing your build progress in tandem. This will be my first plan build balsa kit, as opposed to a balsa WOT4.

Peter Miller13/09/2018 08:01:51
9293 forum posts
1086 photos
10 articles

Hi Martin

The thread was started when I first cut balsa for my prototype. Always glad txo see others adding to tthe thread.

NOTE that the triangular stock in the corner betwen F-1 ans the sides is missing. I checked and I am guilty, I forgot to add it to my own original plan.

Martin McIntosh23/09/2018 14:30:04
2516 forum posts
948 photos

Well, been hard at it since my last post and here is the result so far.


I changed the wing assembly method a little just to suit me but the component parts and end results are similar. I added large holes in the rear formers since I shall be using pull- pull on the rudder, and substituted vertical 1/32 balsa for the ply doublers to save a little weight. Not clear to me how the u/c is held in place so may go a little more conventional here and maybe make up a steerable tailwheel.

Percy Verance23/09/2018 16:38:30
6837 forum posts
138 photos

Martin Re: Ohmen undercarriage.

I just had a look at my copy of the plan, and the u/c wires are a fairly straightforward job. They're held/screwed to the underside of the fuselage with those little grooved nylon things ( can't remember what they're called ) and the vertical ends of the u/c wires - which go up into the fuselage, against the fus side ply doublers - are trapped in the two grooved ply blocks glued to the fus sides. It's just here you could have done with that ply doubler!  You can of course retro fit some in the areas where the u/c wires will be.

P.S. The nylon things I referred to earlier are saddle clamps......


Edited By Percy Verance on 23/09/2018 16:52:33

kc23/09/2018 17:08:09
5575 forum posts
163 photos

The plan shows a 1/8 ply plate across the fuselage and appears to show it covered with 3/32 balsa like the underside . 6mm birch ply would seem a good idea instead - something to get the saddle clamp screws to bite into.

The point about using 1/32 ply doublers is that in a severe crash the ply usually remains intact while the balsa splinters. The ply keeps the model straight enough to rebuild! And as Percy said it's really needed in the u/c mount area. For my model i would choose to use just a 2 inch wide strip of ply instead of the 3.5 inch height shown. Maybe with a triangle to extend up to top of F1 and a couple of filler strips at F2 and F3 to keep the surface level where it meets those formers. Save a lot of weight and expensive ply!

Nigel R23/09/2018 17:48:41
1554 forum posts
336 photos
Crikey Martin that was quick. That's about four or five months building for me!

Would it be worth doing a wing mount uc at this stage?
Peter Miller23/09/2018 18:23:29
9293 forum posts
1086 photos
10 articles

Yesw, there should be triangualr stock in teh F-1/ fuselage side joint.

The 1/32 ply doublers are very important they hold the sides tin one piece.

The 1/8 ply plate under thefuselage for the U/C mount is fine, Due to the long legs going up into the 1/4 ply slotted members it won't pull out.

I got disoritened and the model came down vericlly. I pulled it our and it smashed into the ground dead flat. The U/C just splayed out flat and the model bounced and flew into the field. The fuselage had a clean break just at the rear of the trailing edge. The U/C just needed bending straight (10 SWG insread of my usual 8SWG

Martin McIntosh23/09/2018 19:41:39
2516 forum posts
948 photos

Thanks for the comments. If I build the u/c as per plan then I shall obviously use ply between F2 and F3. I just asked the question because the plan does not appear to show saddle clamps so I wondered if it simply plugged in. Anyway, I do not try to make my models crash proof as I have no intention of bending them if possible!

Update soon.

Percy Verance23/09/2018 20:40:46
6837 forum posts
138 photos

The undercarriage does sort of plug in Martin, and the saddle clamps ensure it stays in.

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!

Find RCM&E! 

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
Airtek Hobbies
Motion RC
Expo Tools 14 July
Wings & Wheels 2018
electricwingman 2017
Gliders Distribution
Advertise With Us
Latest "For Sale" Ads
Which part of building a new traditional balsa aeroplane do you enjoy the most?
Q: Which part of building a new traditional balsa aeroplane do you enjoy the most?

 Research & choosing the model
 Building the fuselage
 Installing the engine and radio systems
 Building the flying surfaces
 All of it!
 None of it. I'd rather someone else did it!

Latest Reviews
Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues

Contact us

Contact us