|SIMON CRAGG||09/06/2019 20:12:53|
|360 forum posts|
Our club hold regular electric glider "one design" events with the HK Phoenix 2000. Everything stock, and all using a zippy 3s 1300 lipo. The events are always well attended due to the "level playing field" of all having exactly the same set up.
However, we tried recording the max rpm of each model today.
The range was from 7800 to 8200 rpm.
Although 400 rpm is not a lot, it makes a difference on a 30 second climb out.
Is the difference just due to some motors being better than others?
We used the same tacho throughout.
All batteries fully charged and balanced.
Is there some way of increasing the rpm, so that we are all at 8200?
Great competition either way!
355 forum posts
Could be some variation between the motors but more likely differences in internal resistance of the batteries.
|Richard Harris||09/06/2019 20:20:20|
2034 forum posts
You could flash the ESC's so they are rpm limited. They do this in E2K pylon racing so that everything is even making it all down to pilot skill.
|Chris Walby||09/06/2019 21:53:46|
926 forum posts
My vote is with Trevor,
Example, I use standard, nanotech, and Graphene lipo and the battery voltage at full throttle drops less wit the Graphene hence the motor turns faster and absorbs more power.
As Scotty would say "You cannot change the laws of physics" and at least some of the additional consumed power should be turned into more speed.
On a different tack, if you wanted to bend the rules then reducing the models drag would probably produce a greater climb rate... especially if the model lost some weight...
The new lightweight gilder depending on the event might not work as well as its heavier brother...swings and roundabouts!
4145 forum posts
IMO the RPM variation noted in the OP is remarkably low.
I think you'll find that 5% variation in the motor's quoted kv figure is reasonable across most, if not all, cheap brushless motors.
I don't know whether or not Richard's suggestion would be possible with the ESC's supplied in the kit but another method would be altitude limiters set to cut motors at a specified altitude or time whichever occurred first.
Edited By PatMc on 09/06/2019 22:01:05
|SIMON CRAGG||10/06/2019 02:58:05|
|360 forum posts|
Thanks for the comments.
I think we will have to live with the variation, and just concentrate on the set up / trimming and flying as smoothly as possible.
I have tried adjusting the motor timing (no difference), balancing the batteries (same) and virtually everything else I can think off, without success!.
Height limiters are a good idea, which we use in other events, but the P2K comp is to be kept as simple and cheap as possible, to encourage as many entrants as possible without additional cost,
|Gordon Tarling||10/06/2019 08:50:42|
|229 forum posts|
Most likely just down to variations in rpm/V and batterry age/internal resistance, as already noted. If it's within the rules, warm the battery up to around 40C in a battery 'oven' just before flying - it'll make a difference. Don't go over 45C though.
|Gordon Tarling||10/06/2019 08:50:43|
|229 forum posts|
Sorry - dup post.
Edited By Gordon Tarling on 10/06/2019 08:51:07
402 forum posts
I had an IC twin once that ran 10x6 APC props, I tested 7 props one after the other on one engine and found something like a +/-200 rpm difference at 10,600 rpm, so even props can have a little variability.
|89 forum posts|
+/- 2.5%, not bad when you consider all the manufacturing, calibration and process variables.
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!