By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by CML

Hawker Hart 72" span model designer identity and c of g?

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
martin collins 109/07/2020 11:45:43
avatar
429 forum posts
199 photos

I bought this about a year ago and have just got round to pulling all the old Skyleader rx and servos out of it to put modern 2.4 stuff in. It has a 2 stroke i.c in it which is coming out to be replaced by an electric set up. The airframe is very light for it`s size and should make a nice flying model, my question is c of g, i have measured where it is on the current set up as it has obviously flown as is so that is my starting point but i have looked at the Gordon Whitehead 72" version and it is much further forward on that. This model is not built from that plan, the tailplane construction is much lighter on this and has no sheeting in the centre of it. I see on Sarik`s website that David Smith did a 73" one and it is on the X List plans list, the plan is nearly £30 so i don`t wish to purchase it unless i know my model IS built from that plan but i would be very interested to know where the c of g is on that. Can anyone help in any way c of g wise? Many thanks for any help given. h hawk 4.jpg img_20200709_111334_resized_20200709_111356267.jpg

Edited By martin collins 1 on 09/07/2020 11:47:14

Stumps09/07/2020 11:55:43
avatar
53 forum posts

Could it be from the Hawker Hind plan that Sarik do ~ RSK1707?

martin collins 109/07/2020 12:00:02
avatar
429 forum posts
199 photos

How did i miss that!!, Might well be but know way of finding out unless i get a look at the plan.........

However, i think this must be much lighter built, i haven`t removed the engine yet but i would say it looks around a .60 two stroke size.

Edited By martin collins 1 on 09/07/2020 12:01:46

Eric Robson09/07/2020 12:14:56
285 forum posts
50 photos

Just a thought, it does not matter how heavy or how light the model is the c of g should be in the same place. Unless the wing positions are not the same on one model as the ones on the plan you have.

Eric r.

martin collins 109/07/2020 12:22:06
avatar
429 forum posts
199 photos

I agree Eric but this has obviously been flown a lot and on this engine as the holes are only large enough to fit this size. The cord of the wing is 11.5" and the two points are 1.5" apart, not a small margin...........

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Support Our Partners
Sussex Model Centre
Slec
CML
electricwingman 2017
Sarik
Advertise With Us
Latest "For Sale" Ads
Has home isolation prompted you to start trad' building?
Q: The effects of Coronavirus

 Yes - for the first time
 Yes - but Ive bashed balsa before
 No - Ive existing projects on the bench
 No - Im strictly an ARTF person

Latest Reviews
Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues

Contact us

Contact us

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!

Find RCM&E!