A discussion of how EDF works and why
Swissflyer | 29/08/2012 14:53:21 |
![]() 162 forum posts 41 photos |
Posted by Mark Powell 2 on 29/08/2012 13:36:00:
Swissflyer, About 30 volts on load and 70 amps. The figures you show don't agree with the ones on the Hacker site I looked at a couple of weeks ago. The B50L (of any rpm/volt ) is 1300 watts and the B50XL is 1700 watts. If you just mistyped when you said 'X' and meant 'XL' then that agrees.
Whoops I had the feeling an X or L fell off in a paste! |
Swissflyer | 30/08/2012 21:41:15 |
![]() 162 forum posts 41 photos |
Space Ship One as an EDF project!
You can read about it (in French) on
Use “Feuilleter cette revue” & go to pages 54 – 55, EDF unit shape on Page 56. |
Swissflyer | 30/08/2012 22:04:51 |
![]() 162 forum posts 41 photos | For Mark Powell, the Space One creator mentions the following EDF unit on his site:
4’200 Watts continuous at 100A. Scorpion HK-4035-560, weight 430g, Chinese turbine Haoye 5 inches (127 mm) Hopefully Google translate can do the rest.
Mark |
Swissflyer | 26/11/2012 17:47:01 |
![]() 162 forum posts 41 photos |
Here is a nice video of a Harrier by Davylah flying very nicely. I adapted Richard’s spreadsheet to calculate how close Davy came to what the “theory” says. He got those dimensions very close. I set up a similar system on my Harrier and it flew fine with plenty of thrust (my club buddy forgot to film it so sorry no video!)
So thanks Richard for a nice tool to help setting up EDF duct sizes for optimum flight characteristics |
Sriranjan Rasakatla | 02/11/2016 10:00:42 |
2 forum posts | Posted by Dizz on 11/08/2012 13:17:45:
With a sealed duct to the fan the bell mouth/rounded lip is on the actual inlet opening, effectively increasing the area by allowing air to enter the duct from larger angles than with a sharp lipped intake. This has the greatest effect on static thrust. With a plenum chamber bell mouth the fan can't draw any more air than is being delivered by the duct infront of it unless of course the chamber is open to the fuselage. If that was the case then you would not have the efficiency gain from the claimed pressure increase ahead of the fan with forward speed (Stumax' explanation for the sealed duct recommend and one I subscribe to given the improved performance over expected of my M52, FD2 and P1091). Maybe the L39 scale intake area is too small wrt fan FSA and that is why Daniel has done it (to allow greater mass to enter the fan? Anyway, here is another conundrum for you theorists.............what is the prediction for this installation:
The intake will have a large splitter plate standing off the fuselage side and the other 3 sides will have a rounded balsa lip. Am enjoying the discussion (again). Pete Did this conduit method method work and did your planes fly with these custom EDF ducts? |
Sriranjan Rasakatla | 03/11/2016 08:46:18 |
2 forum posts | Can someone tell me how to make such ducts like in the picture shown above. I want to make such ducts. What material was used to make such ducts? How was it molded and given a shape like that? |
Gary Vinten 1 | 29/12/2016 18:01:04 |
541 forum posts 351 photos 1 articles | Hi All This tread is massive !!! so maybe some one can answer my question The gap from the air intakes ducts and the edf fan does this need to be open or closed if I close it will it make the fan stall at speed Thanks in advance |
Dave Cooper 3 | 09/10/2018 21:12:30 |
65 forum posts | Folks, I'm a newbie here and forgive me for not having followed all the posts so far....but is this just electric DF we are discussing or does I/C feature as well ? It seems to me there are some fundamental differences : The EDF units are working purely on mass-flow effects (although there will be some heat from motors /esc units). The I/C powered fans have significant heat in the system from cylinder head /muffler temperatures etc,so, unless this 'surplus' heat is ducted elsewhere, it will impinge on the fan unit and modify the mass flow /change the physics of thrust generated. Also, the pitot measurement method is interesting as a means of measuring model airspeed /duct inflow speeds. I have a model wind-tunnel in construction (10% scale), this is to be used for a Le-Mans style sportscar that I'm currently building. The speed range of the full-size car for aerodynamic effects is about 50-150 mph about the same as a DF model ? I have a Phd student working on calibration methods for the tunnel. He says that pitot placement can be critical (I know this from my full-size gliding days). A suggestion is that we use a 'hot-wire' measurement method to be more accurate. I wonder if this could be adapted for on-board model /telemetry use ? Thanks for a very interesting thread. Dave |
Dave Cooper 3 | 10/10/2018 10:55:56 |
65 forum posts | Forgot to mention in the previous post that I have access to some CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) software. The model wind tunnel lap-top is ready but have yet to load the CFD stuff on. The idea is to compare the CFD predictions with the tunnel data. The relevance to Ducted Fan study is that I may be able to model duct /fan characteristics in both the tunnel and the CFD if anyone is interested ? I would need a CAD file of the duct as input to the CFD and an actual model's duct for the tunnel. (I have 'ram-jet' type ducts on the sportscar which I'm waiting to model). Shortly, I'm getting a building firm in to level and strengthen my garage floor. This done, I can finish the tunnel and get to work ! Dave |
dirk tinck | 22/11/2020 18:49:48 |
![]() 763 forum posts 1154 photos | Hello all ! This is one for the aerodynamics engeneers !! I came at the point of designing the thrust tube for my magister 1 /4.5 EDF. The parameters in this job wich i can't choose are the exhaust diameters .They should be 62 mm for true scale , but i already enlarged them to 72 mm. Following the advice of Mr Schubeler himself , this aircraft needs a 128 mm fan to perform well so that's the next fixed measure. Looking inside my fuselage , the transition from 1x128mm to 2x72 should happen in 30cm.
My question : Are there rules to follow in designing the thrust tube ? Should the ''split'' in the middle of the 128mm diameter , start as soon as possible ? Or as far away from the fan as possible ? I came up with a drawing of a Y tube , that looks natural to me . Wat do the experts say ???????????????? |
Simon Chaddock | 22/11/2020 19:29:25 |
![]() 5844 forum posts 3100 photos | Posted by Dave Cooper 3 on 09/10/2018 21:12:30:
The I/C powered fans have significant heat in the system from cylinder head /muffler temperatures etc,so, unless this 'surplus' heat is ducted elsewhere, it will impinge on the fan unit and modify the mass flow /change the physics of thrust generated.
I think you would find any heat benefit added after the fan from IC would be insignificant compared to the flow losses from directing the airflow around or cooling the engine. |
PeterF | 23/11/2020 19:51:02 |
![]() 602 forum posts 743 photos | Posted by dirk tinck on 22/11/2020 18:49:48:
Hello all ! This is one for the aerodynamics engeneers !! I came at the point of designing the thrust tube for my magister 1 /4.5 EDF. The parameters in this job wich i can't choose are the exhaust diameters .They should be 62 mm for true scale , but i already enlarged them to 72 mm. Following the advice of Mr Schubeler himself , this aircraft needs a 128 mm fan to perform well so that's the next fixed measure. Looking inside my fuselage , the transition from 1x128mm to 2x72 should happen in 30cm.
My question : Are there rules to follow in designing the thrust tube ? Should the ''split'' in the middle of the 128mm diameter , start as soon as possible ? Or as far away from the fan as possible ? I came up with a drawing of a Y tube , that looks natural to me . Wat do the experts say ????????????????
The reduction from 128mm to 2x 72mm is quite a noticable reduction in cross sectional area, I do not know the motor mount diameter but it may be OK at 80%. Whilst I do not know the exact rules, I would have a minimum gap of 1 fan diameter between the fan outlet and the start of the splitter so minimum of 128mm in you case. Make the reduction in flow area as smooth and as gradual as possible, the more abrupt the increase in air velocity, the higher the pressure loss. Your drawing shows a gradual change so it looks about right.
|
dirk tinck | 23/11/2020 22:54:48 |
![]() 763 forum posts 1154 photos | Thanks for your input Peter ! I'm just at the begin to make this part and will keep your advice in mind ! |
dirk tinck | 10/01/2021 10:24:27 |
![]() 763 forum posts 1154 photos | Hi all !! For those who do not follow the magister thread :This is an update on the thrust tube. The plug was drawn up by me and 3D printed by Andy Meade.(Great job !! ).It was sanded ,primered and painted wit 2K automotive paint. After that it was moulded in two parts.The next step was a try-out as i made the end part on the moulds with the plug still in place :Worked fine !! x x x x x x
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!