Brand: VMAR

Overall:
2
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
3

READER REVIEWS
Cor Klos  |  Nov 20, 2012

Strengths:
. . . .
Weaknesses:
cover material cockpit floor is cardboard. . . .
Overall:
fuselage 4mm out line. wing is a respray and come with plastic wingtips. . .

Overall:
1
Ease of assembly:
1
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
0
Value for money:
2
GORDON MACCALLUM  |  Oct 18, 2010

Strengths:
very easy build,predictable flyer. good follow on from high wing trainer. . .
Weaknesses:
covering and weak front nose gear but easy fix. . . .
Overall:
i would recommend this as a good plane to take to the strip most days maybe not stylish but great work horse to hone your skills on. . . .

Overall:
4
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
5
ntsmith  |  May 07, 2008

Strengths:
Overall design and appearance. Quick to build. Easy to fly. Stable yet capable.
Weaknesses:
Only weakness I can find is the covering but the upside is that there is not going to be any peeling of the trim as its underneath. . . .
Overall:
Difficult to fault. A well designed and executed kit. Extremely quick and easy to put together - cant say build. .

Overall:
4
Ease of assembly:
5
Build quality:
4
Flight performance:
5
Value for money:
5
David Ashby - moderator  |  Jun 16, 2007

Strengths:
A VMAR Cheapie! Easy to fly. . . .
Weaknesses:
A VMAR Cheapie, poor covering. Boring to look at, will it sustain interest?. . .
Overall:
A typical takeaway. You get what you pay for, it's cheap but fails to provide long term satisfaction. . .

Overall:
2
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
3
X
Login using Modelflying Login