Brand: VMAR

Overall:
2
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
3

READER REVIEWS
Turbycat  |  May 22, 2011

Strengths:
Easy to put together. Easy to fly. . .
Weaknesses:
Covering on the wing halves didn't match. Control snakes came loose. Nose leg didn't last the first take off!!. .
Overall:
Now converted to tailwheel and much happier on our strip. Goes ballistic with a Jen 57. Becoming a favourite! Yet to fit the flap servos. .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
3
Helidel  |  Dec 10, 2007

Strengths:
Good price for what you get. . . .
Weaknesses:
Covering and gluing, broke a wing and found the servo boxes were hand cut(torn from ply). . . .
Overall:
Try it setup as a glider and use "crow"you can then make it talk, especially for a drop landing it'll come down vertically from 30ft and land within 10ft. !!. . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
4
Chris Beer  |  Dec 06, 2007

Strengths:
cheap, easy to build, looks good in the air. . . .
Weaknesses:
covering, glue joints. . . .
Overall:
good plane to play with. just throw it around. good flap trainer. fitted with an os 55 ax it it zips round, flick the flap switch and it will almost stop.

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
5
Ian Regan  |  Dec 05, 2007

Strengths:
first time with flaps, but was good fun. . . .
Weaknesses:
. . . .
Overall:
good but need to make few adjustments befor she gos up againg. . . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
4
Simon Reid  |  Dec 03, 2007

Strengths:
Cheap, so not too worried if it gets bent. . . .
Weaknesses:
Got bent! Anybody need a wing?. . . .
Overall:
Good fun to fly, hadn't got round to fitting the flaps which was a shame. Wouldn't buy another though because of the poor build quality. . .

Overall:
2
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
2
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
3
cameramanpilot  |  Dec 02, 2007

Strengths:
Think you will grow to like flying it with a four stroke infact I got so attached to it the Chris foss acro stayed in the car. . . .
Weaknesses:
For the money it seems about right although I would go over every thing with extra glue being a cheap ARTF. . . .
Overall:
I found it to start with the first three flights not that easy to land a little frightening. You have to get the speed right or it thumps down losing lift quickly. That being said after four flights I started to really love it with and without flaps. I have a 53 fstroke and it fly's happily on this although my friend found his to be too slow thus put a 2 stroke in his.

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
5
grizz  |  Dec 01, 2007

Strengths:
Very aerobatic. Easy assembly. . .
Weaknesses:
Poor covering material. Difficult to remove wrinkles. . .
Overall:
Quite good for the money. . . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
3
Chris Bell  |  Nov 30, 2007

Strengths:
Very nice to fly - great fun Strong construction - easy to put together. fairly airobatic. . .
Weaknesses:
didnt like the metal to metal wheels or stearing connector. . . .
Overall:
had a high winger for 2 years before the wife ditched it. Great fun - one of the planes i'd take every time to the field. Must get another . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
4
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
4
X
Login using Modelflying Login