Brand: VMAR

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
4

READER REVIEWS
Wilson H  |  Nov 24, 2014

Strengths:
Sturdy model plenty of room for gear. . . .
Weaknesses:
Undercarriage a bit weak or just my poor landings paint work chips very easily. . . .
Overall:
Good value for money and good flyer. . . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
4
Bob Little  |  May 08, 2011

Strengths:
Easily assembled,easy to fly. . . .
Weaknesses:
Nose wheel could do with being a little stronger. I would like to see spare parts more easily available. . .
Overall:
I,ve had this aeroplane for 3 years with an sc52 2 sroke. it fly very well and is easily capable of completing most club level aerobatics. . .

Overall:
4
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
5
Peter Russell  |  Jun 04, 2009

Strengths:
Looks good. Flew well with a Laser 75 but needed 40g in the tail to meet CG. . .
Weaknesses:
Nosewheel leg about 1" (25mm in Napoleon) short. Pilot looks terrible. Some of the Stickers are wrong but they do peel off with care. Flap travel is restricted by hinges.
Overall:
Was great value for money until Gormless Gordon b-ggered up the Sterling x/c rate, but is still a good buy. . . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
3
X
Login using Modelflying Login