Brand: Seagull Models

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
4

READER REVIEWS
Pyro  |  Dec 19, 2013

Strengths:
Build quality, Handles nicely with no vices. . . .
Weaknesses:
Undercarriage, fuel tank and engine size spec. . . .
Overall:
I flew mine for 2 years. My advice: Fit a 53-61 2-stroke or 70-82 4-stroke and she will be great, don't even think about a 46. I modified the U/C to a wire one (just like the trainer planes). .

Overall:
4
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
5
Low pass Pete  |  Apr 26, 2012

Strengths:
Looks and ease of build. . . .
Weaknesses:
non noted. . . .
Overall:
Mine has Irvine 53 but a 70 4 stroke would be better. . . .

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
4
Flight performance:
3
Value for money:
4
Phil May  |  Oct 06, 2011

Strengths:
Price, quality & flies great. . . .
Weaknesses:
Fuel tank, nothing else up to now. . . .
Overall:
Cracking model to fly with a . 61 two stroke. Not a 3D but a good sport model. Very stable at low speed with no sudden wing drop/stall.

Overall:
3
Ease of assembly:
3
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
4
stuey  |  Oct 02, 2011

Strengths:
Structure well made, maybe a bit light in places. Easy to fly. . .
Weaknesses:
Instructions so so, cg measurement would be better done at wing root. Some hardware including tank could be better. . .
Overall:
Generally well made and flies nicely on an Irvine 53. Little bit more grunt would be nice. Very good value for money. .

Overall:
4
Ease of assembly:
4
Build quality:
4
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
4
Ben Pettit  |  Oct 15, 2009

Strengths:
Value for money, looks, great pattern ship on a 61. . . .
Weaknesses:
Not really a 3D model, not that strong, c of g wrong in manual if you want it to come down in one peice. . . .
Overall:
mine went great with an sc61 2s until it deadsticked during a hover and ended up perched 100ft up in a poplar. . . only had 2 flights but it was a good airframe.

Overall:
4
Ease of assembly:
5
Build quality:
3
Flight performance:
4
Value for money:
4
X
Login using Modelflying Login