By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

Ripmax WOT4 XL

Manufacturer: Ripmax

Find more products by Ripmax

Average Rating
No. of Reviews6
RRPN/A

Dean Hunter wrote on 06/06/2015:
I SHOULD HAVE PUT AN OS160 IN (AT LEAST) INSTEAD OF A 120....
Strengths: Large WOT4
Weaknesses: Its a heavy 'plane needs a bigger engine than what is recommended.
Overall: 8/10
Ease of assembly
80%
Build quality
60%
Flight performance
60%
Value for money
60%
Overall
60%

Andrew Jarvis 1 wrote on 29/09/2013:
BUILDS INTO A NICE MODEL
Strengths: Flys really well, has the presence in the air of a much larger model, will do all the usual Wot 4 tricks and a few more.
Weaknesses: As mentioned, the elevator push rod is a little tricky, install it before fitting the engine and it's easier. The base of the fin needs extending as out of the box it will not meet with the horizontal stab which is very dangerous, Ripmax, this is a known problem which should have been sorted out after 2 years of production. Tail wheel assembly is not up to the job, my advice is to bin it in favor of a more substantial unit, the wire on mine snapped after a couple of landings.
Overall: I really enjoy flying mine, had a few teething problems but once sorted she doesn't disappoint. I am using a Dle 20 in mine turning a 17 x 6 prop and this gives excellent performance.
Ease of assembly
60%
Build quality
60%
Flight performance
80%
Value for money
80%
Overall
60%

Kev wrote on 12/03/2013:
TYPICAL WOT4
Strengths: Quick assembly, really good value for money flies like a Wot4 should, looks excellent in the sky.
Weaknesses: Need to be a gynaecologist to install the elevator push-rods although I found that feeding a draw string down the fuz eventually made the job very easy. After a few flights the leading edge wing fixing tong works loose and the wing becomes sloppy.
Overall: Given it is a model for semi-accomplished aero modellers the minor build problems don’t really pose a problem for someone who was brought up on scratch building. The “Pilots” may find it a challenge. I have a SC120FS in mine which pulls it out of sight no problem, flies like a pattern ship on full power, flies like an old timer on idle, flies like a 3D machine with maximum rates, and lands at walking pace for perfect 3 point landings. Can’t fault the flying or robustness of what is a WOT4.
Ease of assembly
60%
Build quality
80%
Flight performance
80%
Value for money
80%
Overall
60%

Turbycat wrote on 20/07/2011:
LOOKING GOOD
Strengths: Very quick to put together. Looks very strong construction. Easy assembly and very clear instructions.Very good value for the price I paid from local model shop.
Weaknesses: Nigh on impossible elevator pushrod installation! Could do with better wheels. Mine came with 2 left side engine mounts..oops
Overall: Very impressed with the quality of this artf. Almost wrinkle free finish out the box. Yet to fly but it looks right so should fly right.
Ease of assembly
60%
Build quality
100%
Flight performance
0%
Value for money
80%
Overall
60%

Bob Cotsford wrote on 16/07/2011:
WOT A TREAT
Strengths: Quick assembly, flies like a Wot should, excellent value for money, nice spring devices to secure the clevissessses
Weaknesses: Elevator pushrod installation is nigh on impossible, U/C ply plate needs reinforcing, a bit less weight would be nice, clevis threads are a little loose for my liking. The base of the rudder is cut too short to reach the tailplane making for an insecure fitting as standard - extending it to reach the tailplane fixes this problem.
Overall: A couple of minor niggles, but generally well built - it must be to survive my landings. An ASP 120 FS is really the bottom of the engine range but flies it ok. A 150 FS would be better.
Ease of assembly
60%
Build quality
80%
Flight performance
100%
Value for money
100%
Overall
80%

Paul Adams wrote on 08/03/2011:
BRILLIANT FLYER. I CAN SEE IT BECOMING MY FAVOURITE MODEL
Strengths: Strong boxy fuselage, All parts fit together well. Should cope with British weather.
Weaknesses: Fin needs extending to reach tail plane, otherwise could easily break rear of fuselage off due to large leverage effect. Wheel axles need to be replaced with proper axles rather than mild steel bolts.
Overall: Quick to build, good quality joints / covering. Would I recommend it – Yes
Ease of assembly
60%
Build quality
80%
Flight performance
100%
Value for money
80%
Overall
80%

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
Slec
CML
electricwingman 2017
Sussex Model Centre
Sarik
Advertise With Us
Latest "For Sale" Ads
Has home isolation prompted you to start trad' building?
Q: The effects of Coronavirus

 Yes - for the first time
 Yes - but Ive bashed balsa before
 No - Ive existing projects on the bench
 No - Im strictly an ARTF person

Latest Reviews
Digital Back Issues

RCM&E Digital Back Issues

Contact us

Contact us

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of RCM&E? Use our magazine locator link to find your nearest stockist!

Find RCM&E!